Excellent reality check!

Dustin reads through a list of good signs in the war on evil and the list is featured in twitter at this link:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/937831014965153792.html

Happy Reading.

Go figure, Stephen King is on the black side.

Wrong link in post #2 on this thread - it’s not the content read in the video. I’ll have to go back and search for the right one later! I still highly recommend the video.

Well, is this it?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kE9x-nMQkuQ

Excellent reality check!

><

Yes!

Thank you for posting this.

That is the correct link for the video - the same link as in the OP. But at the end of the video Dustin mentions a link in the description below if one wants to read the text instead of watching him read and discuss it. But I don’t know my way around Twitter so I grabbed the wrong link for the text version and put it in post #2.

I’ll try to fish it out

Here:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/937831014965153792.html

Hell, I'm between tasks:

Account

1) Ive been asked to do a thread about the FBI, Flynn, and other current events, so lets gets started. Where to begin? there is a heck of a lot to cover. So, lets begin at the beginning.

53 tweets

Embed name redacted @nameredacted5 Follow Read on Twitter

2.) twitter must really not want what I have to say getting out. Ok, from the beginning.

3. No one expected PDJT to win. The media, left, pollsters all counted him out. Fast forward to when Hillary's email case broke. They realized they might have a problem but thought they had it well in hand.

4. Let's take at that. Why was Hillary so confident she had nothing to worry about? She knew the fix was in. She knew she was going to get off Scott free.

5. Who investigates classified material breaches? The FBI. Let's take a close look at the FBI. We know at the time James Comey was head of the FBI. James Comey lied to congress, forged documents, and cleared HRC before she was interviewed. newsweek.com/james-comey-fb…

6. Comey, obama and lynch corrupted the entire FBI leadership w HRC protectors. His deputy, McCabe is under investigation right with him. I'm talking criminal charges.

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @ScottAnthonyUSA view original on Twitter

7. McCabe has serious issues. We know he failed to recuse from the HRC email case he had an oversight role in. This was at a time he had taken a huge sum of money from HRC & her insider Terry McCauliffe. freebeacon.com/politics/clint…

8. Dr Jill McCabe w help from Hillary and Terry amassed $1.6 mil in a race she lost compared w half that if her opponent. That seat on average never saw more than $500k per candidate raised.
vpap.org/offices/state-…

9. Virginia has lax state laws allowing candidates to Essentially KEEP the $. Mcauliffe and Clinton gave the McCabes almost $700k while he was investigating her.
redstate.com/patterico/2016…

10. And this. Virginia laws on campaign finances.
dailypress.com/news/politics/…

11. We can speculate about how some of that money was spent. It was clearly a pay off of a friendly FBI agent with power.
truepundit.com/new-fbi-direct…

12. I'm hurrying this Bc I'm not sure if twitter will delete this account before I finish. When Comey was fired, Andrew McCabe, currently under OIG investigation for $s to kill email investigation, and for hatch act violations became acting director.

13. Underneath McCabe was a whole sewer full of similarly corrupt agents. Immediately beneath McCabe was Peter Strzok. And others. This is a good primer on them.

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @rising_serpent view original on Twitter

14. Strzok was one malignant cancer. First, he was one of the investigators who questioned Mike Flynn. Along w another McCabe protege, Bill Preistap.
saraacarter.com/2017/12/04/fbi…

15. Strzok was in charge of the HRC email case while McCabe supervised the investigation. Strzok was one of the agents who questioned Hillary w/o taking notes and not as a sworn deposition.

16. Fast forward: mere days after Comey/McCabe cleared HRC in the email case, he moved onto investigating Team Trump for alleged collusion. This is where it gets REALLY interesting. cnn.com/2017/12/02/pol…

17. So after Comey was popped for lying to congress & other failures, McCabe takes the helm. All this is going on at same time.

18. Peter Strzok acquires and pays for the Steele dossier. He & those in on the coup begin using it.

foxnews.com/politics/2017/…

19. Stop with me? Good. What did they do with it? Well, Sally Q Yates, took the dossier and along w this guy, used it to fraudulently get FISAs to Spy on team trump.
circa.com/story/2017/07/…

20. This is finally the beginning of the story. Yates, Preistap & Strzok used it to target Flynn first. The investigation of Mike Flynn was looking to entrap him, and others anyway they could.

21. When they started to question Flynn, they knew he was doing normal transition work but Russia hysteria was in full swing by design. The goal was to use Logan Act to get him and frame the president and anyone else they could.
washingtonexaminer.com/byron-york-in-…

22. There's a secondary goal here: to put Flynn in a box for lying and go after the president for obstruction. But that's not a legal charge that's legit. The goal wasn't legit charges: it was to take anything that would look legit to a willing congress and stage a coup

23. Thankfully, some really patriotic people saw what was happening and stepped in. Adm Mike Rogers saved the country. On dec 18 he met the NATSEC team of PDJT transition team and briefed them on it all.

24. Rogers did this w/o telling the obama admin, and briefed on players, how they were doing it, what goal was. cbsnews.com/news/reports-p…

25. At that meeting were current DCI Pompeo , former DCI Woolsey, now ambassador, Mike Flynn, Jeff Sessions, and PDJT. Ask yourself: when the ABC story broke Friday, what was the White House response?
thehill.com/homenews/admin…

26. What do you think that room full of patriots and master spooks decided to do? One thing they did was get Flynn to call and get permission. Notice the story was from ABC? Susan Rice husband was a Sr Vice Pres of news, & exec producer there.

27. Protocol would have been for Flynn to call rice and ask. No way the WH says he had the go ahead w/o talking to her. There's a tape.

28. So Flynn essentially pleads guilty to a minor charge that wipes out his NDA associated w his clearance. He's now free to talk about all this. In court.

29. It's curious the day after Flynn plead out we get word McCabe is under criminal investigation by OIG that'll likely charge him, that the agents that left mueller were fired for personal texts & emails derogatory to PDJT while investigating his campaign.

30. How did FBI & Mueller become aware of Peter Strzok emails and texts, personal ones, that showed he was deliberately trying to take down the president of the United States?
businessinsider.com/mueller-peter-…

31. There's one man who was in the room that day at trump tower capable of that, and mueller was given that data and fired the TWO agents. Adm Mike Rogers and NSA.

32. Peter Strzok was having an extramarital affair w the 2nd agent who was fired for the same actions: FBI Attorney & 💵Laundering expert, who reported directly to Andrew McCabe: Lisa Page.

33. Both agents were fired at and rejoined the FBI within a week or two of each other. Strzok was fired on the spot when mueller found out. Both have been assigned to mundane duties in HR. They're no longer allowed to work on any cases.

34. Andrew McCabe is censured, and without any power. All of them are going to be fast tracked out of the bureau, but will likely face criminal prosecution for multiple crimes.
truepundit.com/exclusive-fbi-…

35. There's multiple hanging parties looking to purge the FBI and prosecute conspirators who tried to put Hillary in the White House & failing that tried to stage a coup.
cnn.com/2017/12/03/pol…

37. Strzok is the link. To everything. To Comey & McCabe clearing and beginning an illegal politically motivated counter intelligence investigation based on the dossier he acquired but all knew was fake.

37. Strzok is also the connection to mueller, Flynn, Yates, and the DOJ. Remember Yates said she told the White House Flynn was trouble. In reality she hid it from them, refused to say what she, Preistap & Strzok got from Flynn in questioning.

38. Shifting gears: Yates was no 2 at DOJ. When lynch was fired and before sessions was confirmed, she took the dossier and used it along w FBI Gen Counsel James A Baker & got FISAs knowing the dossier was fake, to spy on team trump.
washingtonpost.com/world/national…

39. That's just one of many. They spied what NSA calls 3-hops deep. Rogers refused to do it. It was politically motivated and it was illegal. He warned team trum. But Clapper & Brennan had their own NSA and used it.
betanews.com/2017/03/27/cia…

40. Rogers new. He reported it. Team trump began its own counter Intell operation to which bob mueller is a part. You see all these FBI people falling? The trap is beginning to spring. The president tweeted mueller will wrap up soon.

41. Listen, I tell you this at great personal risk. This is my 16th, and last, account. Know this: the white hats are winning.

42. Susan Rice, Yates, Comey, Preistap, Strzok, Page, McCabe, baker, Farkhas, Power, Lynch. We know what they did. We saw it coming.

43. Something else: do any of you think that all those people I named, who were using google hangouts and gmail to talk off the record, weren't coordinating and getting approval from the boss? This implicates the former president of the United States.

44. But let's get back to the Logan Act where this all began.US Citizens cannot legally speak or deal on behalf of US without Govt approval. It's a loyalty thing,
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18…

45. The former president of the United States is abroad in countries crucial to American NATSEC actively subverting the US efforts.
mercurynews.com/2017/11/28/oba…

46. A trade war w china in the balance, a high wire balancing act China's at the crux of w DPRK, and India sending troops to assist in Afghanistan.
livemint.com/Politics/QOCF3…

47. So who is really guilty of betraying their country? PDJT and team who are well within the law and constitution, or the obama administration who are actively trying to stage a coup, and who are even now undermining the national security of the United States?

48. Stay tuned. Spread this like wild fire. Use unroll apps and preserve it so twitter cannot kill it. See my other threads here:
threadreaderapp.com/thread/9356844…

49. Addendum: strong rumors Erik Prince, who was also part of trump NATSEC team was present for Rogers briefing. Dig into Academi, & Constellis. Look at board member & what they do. @duckduckgo search col lee van arsdale & triple canopy.

50. These people are the black world. We don't move in the shadows we are the shadows. The deep state better be careful. Their pawns and rooks and knights are being taken off the board. This isn't just a judicial remedy. 3% oath keepers stand by.
dailycaller.com/2017/10/12/exc…

Keep the fight going. Avoid media lies. Be each other's eyes and ears. Debunk lies. Don't turn on each other. They can't win unless you turn on each other. Don't *ever* forget that.

Thank you Sir. Hopefully this is my last acct

External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @AlanDersh view original on Twitter

Did Thread Reader help you to today?
Buy the developer a 🍺 beer or help for the ⚙️ server cost.
Donate with 😘 Paypal or Become a Patron 😍 on Patreon.com

Related threads:

Trending hashtags:

Give your feedback

Help | TOS | Privacy

.container .separator .count{border-bottom:dotted 1px #999}.refresh-info{display:none!important}

Thanks,but no thanks. Good lord.

.

THANKS!!!!

ANYONE WANTING TO READ RATHER THAN WATCH THE VIDEO, txhurl has you covered! SEE POST #9

Please accept my firstborn child as a small token of my appreciation. *bows low and backs out of the room*

you may enjoy the video - it’s a subset and covers interesting points

I know, right? Just helping out a FRiend.

Here’s the print version for those who don’t like to waste time watching a guy try to read off his PC screen on YouTube:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/952993916390903809.html

I’m tired of the nervous nellies and naysayers too. If you don’t think any of this is going to happen, then fine. Screw you. We’ll see in the end but I’m not going to waste time trying to get you to educate yourselves.

Seek and find. Or stay ignorant. Free country, your choice.

The existing case against Hillary and several of her associates for mishandling SAP-level classified information is an open and shut case.

There’s more than enough evidence to charge James Comey and his associates with obstruction of justice for refusing to prosecute these crimes.

Jeff Sessions has been Attorney General for almost a year, and has not performed the arrests yet. The gathering of the evidence was already done, even though they tried to destroy a lot of it.

So you and others should spare us with any lectures on why we should wait on bit players to be popped, to work up the chain, when the biggest fish are already on the hook. Sessions and the DOJ just refuse to simply reel them in.

Hopefully they will be charged at some point. But there’s no reason to have to wait on any more evidence.

I’m not a Q groupie, but his datapoints should be considered. And archived, and analyzed. He scores OK on wheat/chaff, signal/noise, kernel:truth, crazy/hot etc. ratio/matrices.

I’m not a Q groupie, but his datapoints should be considered.

You're welcome to spend your time however you would like, of course. However my opinion is that there is not even a single case yet where this Q account accurately predicted any event with enough detail for anyone to have actually known what specifically was coming in advance. And it probably never will provide that, as the posts are cryptic in nature.

Therefore the analysis has been forcibly reduced to looking at events that already transpired, and then trying to determine if his cryptic texts might have somehow been a clue, even though they never actually predicted the exact event. Usually the post-event analysis is even a stretch.

So if the account can't accurately predict events with sufficient detail to serve any purpose, I see no value in spending my time trying to tie back events that did happen back to the otherwise unnecessary information that the account put out.

Just my thoughts, thanks.

Wow, what a great post! I spent a couple of hours after I went down some of the rabbit hole links. Thank you!

1) Ive been asked to do a thread about the FBI, Flynn, and other current events, so lets gets started. Where to begin? there is a heck of a lot to cover. So, lets begin at the beginning.

Embed code for your website:

Share this page!