Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just saw "Darkest Hour"
Darkest Hour movie ^

Posted on 01/09/2018 11:18:14 PM PST by iowamark

Please pardon the vanity. I just saw Darkest Hour. It was really excellent and moving. Both history and drama. Some lines and scenes are obviously fictionalized. The scene with Churchill riding the subway is silly, but I understand the need for dramatic license.

It is about the last three weeks of May 1940. Churchill becomes Prime Minister, even though Chamberlain, Halifax, and King George dislike him. Hitler invades France, which becomes a rout. Halifax insists on peace negotiations with Hitler. Churchill wavers, but decides to fight on. It is impossible to say what might have happened if Britain had made a deal with Hitler.

I strongly encourage all to see Darkest Hour. The cast is all excellent.

Gary Oldman as Churchill, Kristin Scott Thomas as his wife, Ben Mendelsohn as George VI, Lily James as his secretary, Ronald Pickup as Neville Chamberlain, Stephen Dillane Lord Halifax.


TOPICS: History; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: churchill; darkesthour; garyoldman; hollywood; moviereview; winstonchurchill
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
To: Netz

>>The film is good and it appears to be the way most people learn history now. Once we all read books. If the film inspires people to look things up on Google, then it is good.

Fahrenheit 451 wasn’t about government censorship, it was how they watch tv (or the movie) instead of reading anymore.


21 posted on 01/10/2018 2:01:41 AM PST by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BeauBo; iowamark

From some newspaper:
“And McCarten admitted that no, it probably did not happen. But something like it might well have. “This the kind of thing he did right through the war,” said McCarten of Churchill. “He would go AWOL, disappear and pop up somewhere in London with ordinary people, to find out what they were thinking. So that scene was drawn from deep research, but we have no record that it happened.”

i thought the scene was a dramatization if true events. Why not?

It’s not as if Churchill wasn’t successful. And for a good reason he would have read Shakespeare. This was Prince Hal

That’s Henry IV for the rio lindo folks


22 posted on 01/10/2018 2:24:55 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Yes, Churchill’s own work is still the best source on the war, although it contains some errors, intentional or unintentional. Of course, there are many things like codebreaking that he could not mention at the time.

I am still unclear on why Halifax declined the PM offer on May 9 when he could have had it. The movie has him saying: “My time has not yet come.” I think that that was unlikely. It is clear that Halifax and Churchill had a mortal fight over peace negotiations later that month. The movie has George VI coming to visit Churchill to promise his support.


23 posted on 01/10/2018 2:28:38 AM PST by iowamark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: a fool in paradise

F451 was about censorship and denying people to obtain information outside of the official version. Books were banned so people would stop thinking and listen to the State...no?


24 posted on 01/10/2018 2:29:17 AM PST by Netz ( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: stanne

Dunkirk was good but you have to understand it was an artistic film concentrating on elements of fear and tension and not of the “Longest Day” or “Saving Private Ryan” genre.


25 posted on 01/10/2018 2:31:58 AM PST by Netz ( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Churchill - and this movie - clearly showed that for Freedom to be preserved in the face of a strong, evil, dangerous and statist military power; courage, bravery and a willingness to take risks and losses are REQUIRED. Churchill was flawed, but he had what it took as a person and as a leader to effectively rally people to the cause of freedom at a dangerous time when fear tempted most politicians to trade and sacrifice freedom in the false hope of greater “Security.”


26 posted on 01/10/2018 2:35:45 AM PST by JustTheTruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

IMHO: Lord Halifax it would seem did not want the burden of the office of PM at that time. In short, he was scared to assume that role.


27 posted on 01/10/2018 2:35:51 AM PST by Netz ( and looking for a way ti IMPROVE mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Netz

Dunkirk was popular

Any war movie that depicts the protagonists with not jus clean shaved throughout but hairstyles loses me

No idea who was who No characters, relationships, names.

No


28 posted on 01/10/2018 2:36:27 AM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Thanks for this
The History Vhannel this week is running a program “ Secrets of the Axis” with some fascinating insights into moves by some Germans to make a deal and reach a settlement with the British before Hitler’s ruinous invasion if Russia
German and Japanese Hands off the British Empire in return for England’s acceptance of the new German dominated mainland European and Japanese Asian Pacific order
Members of the British aristocracy including some military were supportive of this - amenable to the idea that if Germany and Japan were defeated the main beneficiaries would not be England - but the US which would then dominate the world


29 posted on 01/10/2018 2:39:24 AM PST by silverleaf (A man who kneels for the national anthem doesn't stand for much of anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

....disappointed with Dunkirk... Cinematography excellent, but the movie was too “choppy”, jumping from scene to scene became annoying


30 posted on 01/10/2018 3:30:52 AM PST by Doogle (( USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand....never store a threat you should have eliminated)))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
Dunkirk was all action and few words. It was an exercise in minimalism. I had many questions which The Darkest Hour answered. The Darkest Hour had the depth of dialog that gave a fuller understanding. It had both action and the dialog to get you immersed in the great existential threat to Britain posed by Hitler. Both movies showed men with great courage and the cost for doing what is right. Dunkirk could have been more substantial if it had more dialog.
31 posted on 01/10/2018 3:42:02 AM PST by jonrick46 (Trump continues to have all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa

“He is a humble man, with much reason for his humility”


32 posted on 01/10/2018 3:43:08 AM PST by Don@VB (Power Corrupts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Don@VB

I believe Churchill was referring to Anthony Eden in previous post.


33 posted on 01/10/2018 3:48:10 AM PST by Don@VB (Power Corrupts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

The German Army also bears responsibility for antagonizing the Russian people. The SS were not the only forces brutalizing the population of the USSR.


34 posted on 01/10/2018 4:05:26 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Darkest Hour is a good complement to Dunkirk. it is more accessible than Dunkirk because it is a straightforward story line and less concentration is needed. i saw Darkest Hour twice over last month even though i was initially skeptical that Oldman could make me believe he was Churchill. he did-brilliantly. he deserved that Golden Globe.


35 posted on 01/10/2018 4:06:16 AM PST by avital2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

We got lucky that our German scientists were better than Russia’s German scientists.


36 posted on 01/10/2018 4:12:44 AM PST by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: outofsalt

Actually, the Russians didn’t do anything, they were still under the spell of Levchenko.

Blame the Rosenbergs and fellow travelers for that little debacle.


37 posted on 01/10/2018 4:15:26 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Really nice, satisfying movie and Oldman was excellent as was Ronald Pickup as Chamberlain. And not an F bomb in site. We get all these movies on dvd because we belong to the actor’s union and I lasted about 15 minutes with the hateful 3 Billboards.


38 posted on 01/10/2018 4:23:57 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iowamark

Thank you, iowamark...I will go see it!


39 posted on 01/10/2018 4:26:53 AM PST by rlmorel (Leftists: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6

Most probably yes. While the Germans are excellent at organization. Their atomic bomb project was a disjointed and disorganized affair. Nine different agencies all had a hand in the program. The bureaucratic infighting between these agencies slowed production to a snails pace. Some of the scientists, like Heisenberg, may have been trying to sabotage the project. There effort at A bomb creation paled in comparison to our Manhattan Project.


40 posted on 01/10/2018 4:27:43 AM PST by Bull Snipe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson