Posted on 01/09/2018 7:45:06 AM PST by SeekAndFind
Those who fear Amazon is on the verge of becoming a monopoly that eats all competitors and locks up the retail market should take note of an announcement last week by Sears Holdings: The company will be closing another 100 stores this year.
Some will see Sears downward trajectory as proof that Amazon is on the verge of assuming near-monopolistic dominance of the retail market. In fact, it proves the opposite: No one can blithely assume that kind of power, at least not for long. Just look at Sears history: Back in the 1960s, many feared the Sears chain would mow down all that stood before it, with sales revenue that equaled 1 percent of U.S. GDP more than Amazons sales do today.
Sears fate after closing another 400 stores last year illustrates the fact that yesterdays economic tiger could become tomorrows economic pussycat. Thats true in all industries, including (perhaps especially) retail.
Many argue that Amazon is eliminating jobs and diminishing once-thriving shopping districts by drawing customers and revenue away from bricks and mortar institutions. But appeals to community loyalty will not undermine consumers seeking the most efficient shopping experience they can get. Cursing the rise of ecommerce is really nothing more than cursing the proliferation of consumer choice and convenience.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearmarkets.com ...
They lost me when Craftsman became Crapsman. The low level stuff was K-mart level, the higher stuff was up-priced versions of low level Ryobi or maybe DeWalt at the top.
They lost my wife when Target started selling better quality kids clothes at the same price.
In a small town, at a small Sears store, you could order from the catalog and pick it up at the store somewhat conveniently. In a large store in a large town, the catalogue pickup was a mess, as it used the same informal 'just pile it anywhere' filing process for packages waiting for pickup.
They were being stupid on all fronts well before Amazon ate their lunch.
The internet makes some changes easy, but the fantastic improvement in inventory management, warehouse handling, and shipping that Amazon provided were not easy. That was in large part a brick and mortar effort.
Bezos simply thought harder and better about what business(es) he could be in, what he wanted to be in. The Sears guys just kept cutting quality, never re-thought anything.
And Bezos was supported by a many boatloads of money to build what he built without having to show a profit. The money folk did not see anything in Sears management that excited them.
You forgot the sarcasm tag.
Jeff Bezos is now the richest man EVER: Amazon CEO's fortune rockets
[snip] "In the last 12 months, Amazons stock has climbed by nearly 57 per cent. So far in 2018, the e-commerce giants shares have jumped 6.6 per cent."
Basically the same here. I use Amazon the way people use the brick 'n mortar stores. Shop there, find what I want, check the reviews and then search for the same item on eBay. Usually find it and get free shipping, something you can't get on Amazon without going Prime.
I do think Walmart is Amazons best competitor.
The Amazon proposition is if its online portal is worth the 20% margin it charges. The answer is yes, and companies like Nike are going all in now. It will be a long while before someone can compete w/ Amazon, but they will. For now, Amazon will rule.
My local Sears closed several years ago. The only thing it was good for was the Craftsman section - gave me a place to hang out while the wife and kids shopped. They had nothing worth buying other than tools, though - hadn’t spent a dime their for years before they closed.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.