Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nunes threatens contempt after FBI stonewalls House re: agent demoted for anti-Trump bias.
Wash. Examiner ^ | 12/2/2017 | Byron York

Posted on 12/03/2017 1:08:13 PM PST by Signalman

House Intelligence Committee chairman Devin Nunes has issued an angry demand to the FBI and Department of Justice to explain why they kept the committee in the dark over the reason Special Counsel Robert Mueller kicked a key supervising FBI agent off the Trump-Russia investigation.

Stories in both the Washington Post and New York Times on Saturday reported that Peter Strzok, who played a key role in the original FBI investigation into the Trump-Russia matter, and then a key role in Mueller's investigation, and who earlier had played an equally critical role in the FBI's Hillary Clinton email investigation, was reassigned out of the Mueller office because of anti-Trump texts he exchanged with a top FBI lawyer, Lisa Page, with whom Strzok was having an extramarital affair. Strzok was transferred to the FBI's human resources office — an obvious demotion -- in July.

The Post reported that Strzok and Page exchanged text messages that "expressed anti-Trump sentiments and other comments that appeared to favor Clinton."

Word of the messages and the affair were news to Nunes, even though the committee had issued a subpoena that covered information about Strzok's demotion more than three months ago. The committee's broadly worded subpoena for information related to the so-called Trump dossier went to the FBI and DOJ on Aug. 24. In follow-up conversations on the scope of the subpoena, committee staff told the FBI and DOJ that it included information on the circumstances of Strzok's reassignment.

On Oct. 11, Nunes met with deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein. In that meeting, Nunes specifically discussed the committee's request for information about Strzok.

In an Oct. 31 committee staff meeting with the FBI, bureau officials refused a request for information about Strzok.

On Nov. 20, the committee again requested an interview with Strzok. (Three days earlier, on November 17, Strzok met with the Senate Intelligence Committee.)

On Nov. 29, Nunes again spoke to Rosenstein, and again discussed Strzok.

On Dec. 1, the committee again requested to speak with Strzok.

After each occasion, the FBI and DOJ did nothing. Now, in what appears to be an orchestrated leak, both the Post and Times published the reason for Strzok's demotion, along with concerns that the revelation might help President Trump. "Among federal law enforcement officials, there is great concern that exposure of the texts they exchanged may be used by the president and his defenders to attack the credibility of the Mueller probe and the FBI more broadly," the Post reported. The Times reported that "the existence of the text messages is likely to fuel claims by Mr. Trump that he is the target of a witch hunt."

Well, yes. It will be of concern to Trump's defenders, and to defenders of fair investigations generally, that such an important figure in both the Clinton and Trump probes privately expressed bias. It will be important for investigators -- and the public -- to see Strzok's and Page's texts to assess the extent of the problem. But in any event, Nunes is extremely unhappy -- not only with the revelation of bias but with the FBI's resistance.

"By hiding from Congress, and from the American people, documented political bias by a key FBI head investigator for both the Russia collusion probe and the Clinton email investigation, the FBI and DOJ engaged in a willful attempt to thwart Congress' constitutional oversight responsibility," Nunes said in a statement Saturday afternoon. "This is part of a months-long pattern by the DOJ and FBI of stonewalling and obstructing this committee's oversight work, particularly oversight of their use of the Steele dossier. At this point, these agencies should be investigating themselves."

To add insult to injury, at just the moment the leaked stories appeared, the Justice Department out of the blue notified Nunes that it would meet some of the committee's demands for information that it had been refusing for months. That didn't make the chairman happy, either. "The DOJ has now expressed -- on a Saturday, just hours after the press reports on Strzok's dismissal appeared -- a sudden willingness to comply with some of the committee's long-standing demands," Nunes said in the statement. "This attempted 11th-hour accommodation is neither credible nor believable, and in fact is yet another example of the DOJ's disingenuousness and obstruction."

As a result, Nunes said he has instructed committee staff to draw up a contempt of Congress citation for Rosenstein and for FBI Director Christopher Wray. The chairman promised to take action on the citation before the end of December unless the FBI and DOJ meet all the committee's outstanding demands.

Obviously Nunes is angry that he did not know about the real reasons for Strzok's demotion. And he is equally angry with the FBI's and DOJ's treatment of the committee. Contempt of Congress is a big move for lawmakers to take, especially against an agency controlled by the same party as leaders of the House. But remember, House Speaker Paul Ryan has already said the FBI and DOJ "stonewalled" the House, and he demanded that it comply immediately. That was five weeks ago. Now, after this latest episode, it seems likely that leaders in Congress are becoming increasingly frustrated with what they see as the FBI and DOJ jerking lawmakers around. At some point, they will act.

UPDATE: On Sunday, Justice Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores sent this statement: "We disagree with the Chairman's characterization and will continue to work with congressional committees to provide the information they request consistent with our national security responsibilities. The Department has already provided members of [the House Intelligence Committee] and House leadership with several hundred pages of classified documents and multiple briefings -- including for example clear answers as to whether any FBI payments were made to a source in question related to the dossier -- and has more recently cleared key witnesses they have requested to testify, including Mr. McCabe, Mr. Strzok, and the alleged handler in question."


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 115th; byronyork; fbi; nunes; obstructionistdems; stonewall
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last
Full Title:

Byron York: Nunes blows up, threatens contempt after FBI stonewalls House on Russia investigator demoted for anti-Trump bias

1 posted on 12/03/2017 1:08:13 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Nunes, quit threatening and start doing.

The FBI and DOJ have dragged their feet long enough.


2 posted on 12/03/2017 1:11:06 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
"Nunes, quit threatening and start doing."

Nunes will fade after the publicity dies down. If he were serious, there would be no warning. But then AG Sessions won't do anything.

3 posted on 12/03/2017 1:13:57 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Carl Vehse

Sessions has been a huge disappointment.


4 posted on 12/03/2017 1:15:45 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Lemme get this straight...

- The incoming NSA, a Lt. Gen. in the Army, stonewalls the FBI on a politically charged question they asked him about his reasonable contacts with a foreign ambassador. He is fired, vilified, and eventually extorted into pleading guilty to the moral equivalent of jaywalking, and it’s not clear if what he plead to was even a crime.

- The FBI and the DoJ stonewalls the Congress of the United States for three months (!) on a question made to them about the bias of two people investigating the the President of the United States. Nothing happens, they whistle as they walk away and laugh at the hapless Congressmen, who are merely the elected representatives of the People.

Got it. Federal employees are above everyone else in the law, in fact they ARE the law, answer only to themselves and they reserve the right to run a frame on the President of the United States if they feel he isn’t deferential enough to them.


5 posted on 12/03/2017 1:16:43 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Related...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3610150/posts


6 posted on 12/03/2017 1:17:51 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Regulator

Ok, can we start shooting now?


7 posted on 12/03/2017 1:18:11 PM PST by crosdaddy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Let’s say you have a favorite sports team. Do you give up on them and call them a big disappointment when the game is partially over, or do you wait til the end?


8 posted on 12/03/2017 1:19:49 PM PST by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crosdaddy

Think it’s getting close to that.

Closer then I’ve ever seen in my lifetime, and that includes August 1974.


9 posted on 12/03/2017 1:20:27 PM PST by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

Somebody needs to kick some FBI + CIA butt.
Since when is the DC law so corrupt that it’s law enforcement agency is like the FBI has been for a long time?

DC, the center of criminal activity in USA.


10 posted on 12/03/2017 1:23:42 PM PST by veracious (UN = OIC = Islam ; Dems may change USAgov completely, just amend USConstitution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

I’d like to know what mischief the FBI girlfriend has caused...the one he was having an affair with.


11 posted on 12/03/2017 1:23:46 PM PST by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Exactly...You beat me to it...

ACTION....Not words....


12 posted on 12/03/2017 1:24:01 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veracious

Our government makes the mafia look like Girl Scouts....


13 posted on 12/03/2017 1:25:29 PM PST by JBW1949 (I'm really PC....PATRIOTICALLY CORRECT!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ButThreeLeftsDo

Lots of headers about this on FR now..........


14 posted on 12/03/2017 1:27:33 PM PST by caww (freeen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Good for him. Looks like the FBI does not want any oversight.


15 posted on 12/03/2017 1:28:42 PM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Sherlock Sessions will get this squared away. Have no fear!


16 posted on 12/03/2017 1:35:44 PM PST by LeoTDB69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

Trump is going all MAGA on the Deep State and the FBI today.

Two of his tweets.

- - -

“Donald J. Trump; Verified account @realDonaldTrump
9h9 hours ago

After years of Comey, with the phony and dishonest Clinton investigation (and more), running the FBI, its reputation is in Tatters - worst in History! But fear not, we will bring it back to greatness.”

” Donald J. Trump ;Verified account @realDonaldTrump

Tainted (no, very dishonest?) FBI “agent’s role in Clinton probe under review.” Led Clinton Email probe. @foxandfriends Clinton money going to wife of another FBI agent in charge.”


17 posted on 12/03/2017 1:41:41 PM PST by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Good article. So Nunes was denied, in person, by Rosenstein multiple times, for those keeping score.


18 posted on 12/03/2017 1:42:16 PM PST by Golden Eagle (Donald Trump: "There's a lot of people disappointed in the Justice department, including me.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Bob, u live in a Fansasy reality.


19 posted on 12/03/2017 1:42:25 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small fee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

Sessions can end this crap in one minute...the aSs wipe


20 posted on 12/03/2017 2:01:53 PM PST by rrrod (just an old guy with a gun in his pocke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-31 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson