Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: dayglored

I don’t really see why Intel would want such a chip in home computers, where this is no network admin. Why don’t they make separate chips for home use?


4 posted on 12/03/2017 8:01:33 AM PST by proxy_user
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: proxy_user
> I don’t really see why Intel would want such a chip in home computers, where this is no network admin. Why don’t they make separate chips for home use?

There are those who believe the real purpose of the ME was remote administration from government agencies, not just local-network system admins. Its feature set includes all sorts of spy-enabling and remote-control capabilities.

One has to wonder why it was kept such a low-profile "feature" for so long?

5 posted on 12/03/2017 8:09:56 AM PST by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: proxy_user

Originally the management stuff was limited to the more expensive vPro and Xeon processors that targeted business environments (IIRC) to allow remote install of the OS and remote console and BIOS access, etc.

I’m suprised that Intel put it in processors for home and mobile use, due to the added cost for a feature they are unlikely to use or need. It’s a nontrivial addition - a separate CPU and a rather complex hidden second OS.


6 posted on 12/03/2017 8:20:56 AM PST by Gideon7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson