Skip to comments.
Quantum experiment reveals time really CAN flow backwards
DAILYMAIL.COM ^
| 30 November 2017
| Mark Prigg
Posted on 11/30/2017 7:46:22 PM PST by sparklite2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: mairdie
ok I’ll take .28 Cents worth of credit lol
61
posted on
12/01/2017 12:27:32 AM PST
by
Bob434
To: Pray All Day
62
posted on
12/01/2017 1:01:39 AM PST
by
thinden
To: sparklite2
The really weird thing about time itself is one cannot know which direction time actually flows; we think it flows forward - past to future, but there is no way to know if the opposite is really the true direction - future to past. There was a sci-fi book decades ago that explored this theory.
63
posted on
12/01/2017 3:51:34 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: sparklite2
64
posted on
12/01/2017 3:57:17 AM PST
by
KSCITYBOY
(The media is corrupt)
To: sparklite2
The article you quoted says near the end, that the results are not uniformly reproducible. P> It looks like another case of...
"Cold Fusion"
65
posted on
12/01/2017 3:59:01 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: PIF
At the macroscopic level, entropy increases; statistically.
At the level of a single quantum mechanical state-to-state conversion, time reversal invariable holds.
66
posted on
12/01/2017 4:01:44 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: grey_whiskers
If that was in English, I’d say you agree - but then you might be citing it from the past, we just cannot discern the direction of your comment.
67
posted on
12/01/2017 4:07:07 AM PST
by
PIF
(They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
To: blueunicorn6
Well, it was worth a try. (You weren't doing 119 through the time/space continuum -- like Judge Jeanine Pirro -- were you?)
To: grey_whiskers
The phenomenon has been reproduced many times. It happens, there’s no denying.
That’s all one can say with certainty. There may be something to cold fusion, too, but too minuscule to be worth much on its own.
69
posted on
12/01/2017 9:36:53 AM PST
by
sparklite2
(I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
To: sparklite2
You missed the pun: remember from freshman chem or physics lab, the "latent heat of fusion"... And in *cold* water, so cold fusion, ha ha.
70
posted on
12/01/2017 9:40:21 AM PST
by
grey_whiskers
(The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
To: sparklite2
To: sparklite2
I think going back to 1978 as an 11 year old would be just about right...
72
posted on
12/01/2017 12:52:11 PM PST
by
mowowie
To: Moonman62
73
posted on
12/01/2017 12:55:23 PM PST
by
mowowie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson