To: Olog-hai
"...claiming that it stemmed from an incident from years earlier in which he says he accidentally touched an acquaintance’s bare back while attempting to console her."
BS. Has to be more to it than that.
65 posted on
11/30/2017 6:53:54 PM PST by
mass55th
(Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
To: mass55th
Two comments, he sure does remember details. Was this a significant event in his life?
Second, if t’s older than 10 years ago and no forcible assault, I really don’t care about it. I give one extension to kids, but not to women who are slightly touched.
68 posted on
11/30/2017 6:57:33 PM PST by
morphing libertarian
(A proud member of the Ruthie Bader Afternoon Nap Club)
To: mass55th
69 posted on
11/30/2017 6:58:31 PM PST by
Pelham
(Rope. Tree. Journalist.)
To: mass55th
This is the “pernicious maxim” ... that where much is alleged, something must be true.
I don’t remember where I saw that, years ago.
80 posted on
11/30/2017 7:54:31 PM PST by
dr_lew
(I)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson