It's not a matter of "disagreeing". It's your obvious dishonesty, assuming you're not really so dumb as to honestly think any of those 3 are possibilities after being shown the evidence.
OK, OK, if I acquiesce to your demand that he merely re-ingested some strange object that he’d inexplicably regurgitated in the middle of a debate, would your sense of honor be sufficiently assuaged as to cease attacking my own honor?
That would be nice, and I’d even thank you.