Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Whole article worth reading to understand the arguments on each side.
1 posted on 11/26/2017 6:36:09 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: aMorePerfectUnion

cell phone bkmk


2 posted on 11/26/2017 6:43:55 PM PST by ptsal ( Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - M. Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

>>whether the history of cell phone locations stored by a phone service provider is searchable without a warrant.

Why warrantless searches?

Quit data mining.


3 posted on 11/26/2017 6:47:12 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

In a sane world, we could use a Privacy Amendment to the US Constitution.


4 posted on 11/26/2017 6:48:32 PM PST by Paladin2 (No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

The guy signed over this right to privacy, yes. But to the phone company, not police. Get a damned warrant.


5 posted on 11/26/2017 6:49:20 PM PST by sparklite2 (I hereby designate the ongoing kerfuffle Diddle-Gate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

I need a real time digital shredder.


6 posted on 11/26/2017 6:49:22 PM PST by blackdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

This ruling would have an effect on local LEO’s, but I think the NSA and military are going to keep a copy of everything that happens no matter what.


10 posted on 11/26/2017 7:29:14 PM PST by BusterDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

I understand and sympathize that police work can be difficult. But our Fourth Amendment is more important than many of us realize, so police should consider using some of the older methods of investigation again. They weren’t all that difficult.


12 posted on 11/26/2017 7:36:36 PM PST by familyop ("Welcome to Costco. I love you." --Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

The data on your phone may belong to you.

The data in the cloud does not belong to you.

If the company that owns your cloud data wants to give data to the police, they can.


14 posted on 11/26/2017 8:07:31 PM PST by Blue House Sue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

the National District Attorneys Association warned the court against eviscerating the third party doctrine.

“To do so would preclude SEC [Securities and Exchange Commission] and IRS [Internal Revenue Service] summonses for financial information necessary for their functioning and would bring a halt to countless state prosecutions dependent upon review of third-party records

This is reason enough to find for the defendant. The IRS has been allowed to Abuse the Citizens for far too long. Financial Institutions will gladly STEAL your Money and give it to the IRS simply by receiving a letter. In Fact the IRS NEVER seeks a Court Order for Levies, but banks just go along.


22 posted on 11/27/2017 6:07:47 AM PST by eyeamok (Tolerance: The virtue of having a belief in Nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson