Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alternatives?
The problem is, the guys 30 to 39 are wising up. More of them have come to the conclusion that they don’t want to be second fiddle given the current family court system. If they can go it alone 22-29, why not go it alone thereafter?

It is nice to have somebody to love and who loves you in return, and children are great. The problem is the vast majority of women alive today have been so steeped in feminist crap that even the ones who profess to not be man hating flaming feminists are still actually feminists.

I know a few single women from way back when I was young who are now in their 50s and single and they are so self-centered that they talk about finding a good man as if they deserve one, but I never hear anything from them about wanting a man they can love. They want all the trimmings of a realtionship but have no capability to return the favors.

106 posted on 11/23/2017 1:17:45 PM PST by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: OldMissileer
If they can go it alone 22-29, why not go it alone thereafter?

Thereafter is much, much better.

There is an endless supply of 22-24 year olds for men up to 60 or so, and getting them becomes much easier as a man becomes established.

The women in the harems in their 20s now, most of them will never marry. I was on the market from age 43-46, and, let me tell you, dating women 30-39 is a horror show.

Back in high school, in the Lost World, we had a name for girls with multiple partners. That name was "ruined".

It was true then, and it's true now.

109 posted on 11/23/2017 1:30:35 PM PST by Jim Noble (Single payer is coming. Which kind do you like)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson