I agree. It looks like it was done on purpose.
He didn’t have to be holding directly up against himself in that particular spot. You would have also thought he would have been over handing it the child with an outstretched hand too. But no, it was very much obvious the designer wanted this to have (obvious) hidden meanings.
Yup. Outstretched hand with the loaf being held sideways with the child reaching up towards it, that would be fine. But a loaf shaped like a male member coming right out of his crotch and with the kid reaching to give him a handjob gesture ? This couldn’t be more blatant and offensive short of having the boy having his mouth right on the end of the (ahem) “loaf.”