To: C19fan
I thought accepting a settlement meant you had to keep your mouth shut publicly. I guess such a law is rarely if ever enforced.
To: lee martell
Pay out was for half sister who accused him
7 posted on
11/16/2017 10:49:51 AM PST by
RummyChick
(I have no inside sources, media sources, or federal government employee sources. NONE)
To: lee martell
I thought accepting a settlement meant you had to keep your mouth shut publicly Money's run out.
Back for another bite of the apple.
8 posted on
11/16/2017 10:50:06 AM PST by
grobdriver
(Where is Wilson Blair when you need him?)
To: lee martell
Saw a thread that one state wants to prohibit such settlements with NDA.
18 posted on
11/16/2017 10:58:32 AM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
To: lee martell
"I thought accepting a settlement meant you had to keep your mouth shut publicly. I guess such a law is rarely if ever enforced." It's not a law. Many settlements contain non-disclosure agreements.
28 posted on
11/16/2017 11:08:18 AM PST by
mlo
To: lee martell
I thought accepting a settlement meant you had to keep your mouth shut publicly. I guess such a law is rarely if ever enforced. It's not "law." It's a contract. You can be sued for reneging on the contract. Damages could be the cash paid, or additional damages, say for reputation, could be added. But, it won't happen. It's dead and buried after 30 years, and I doubt Stallone wants to re-air it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson