Actions have consequences. Or don’t you believe that? Can’t you see this is all about consequences for that idiot and his F Trump truck? You don’t want the law to take its rightful course of action as that idiot is disturbing the peace? I suppose you don’t want private citizens even disagreeing with his “freedom of speech” either.
Let me guess. That is your truck isn’t it?
What are you talking about ‘disagreeing with his freedom of speech”? What the heck does that mean? Hell, I’d disagree with him if I ran into them. You have an absolute right to put a F**K Hillary sticker on your truck. Actions have consequences, I think I’d not want to be dumb enough to drive that truck into the parking lot of a lot of bars I know, but that is not the point- it’s not up to any governmental entity to say what you can or can’t express unless it’s defamation , incitement to riot or the like. That is a classic “I hate what you say but I’ll defend your right to say it”.
If you think I’d agree with the sentiment *OR* be stupid enough to put such a thing on my truck even if I did you’re a bigger idiot than the driver, which would be quite an accomplishment, since having that sticker on a truck in TEXAS seems pretty dumb to me.
My point is only that A) this will get shot down in the courts or B) if it doesn’t and somehow gets upheld, it’s a VERY bad precedent