Why? Do these immunity deals apply today?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
2 posted on
11/14/2017 4:39:59 PM PST by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
3 posted on
11/14/2017 4:40:00 PM PST by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
4 posted on
11/14/2017 4:40:01 PM PST by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Usually one receives immunity for testifying against another person. Such was not the case here. Further, these witnesses were allowed to destroy evidence as part of this immunity.
7 posted on
11/14/2017 4:54:52 PM PST by
Hotlanta Mike
("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What does that deal have to do with uranium is my question.
8 posted on
11/14/2017 4:58:46 PM PST by
enduserindy
( I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why give so much immunity if no crimes were committed?
Why cut loose little fish if you aren’t going after bigger fish?
Why tolerate the biggest fish’s lies and disrespectful mocking answers about wiping servers with rags?
9 posted on
11/14/2017 4:58:57 PM PST by
a fool in paradise
(Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
10 posted on
11/14/2017 4:59:08 PM PST by
timestax
To: Oldeconomybuyer
President Trump needs to read 1 Kings chapter 2.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As immunity against prosecution, the grants seem to apply. So they cannot be prosecuted. However, my understanding is that immunity now requires them to testify (since they cannot be prosecuted) and if they refuse to give testimony they will be cited for contempt. They are not immune from contempt charges.
This seems to mean they may be required to testify against Hillary and Bill.
15 posted on
11/14/2017 5:24:54 PM PST by
Rapscallion
(Politics just makes us hate each other. It's un-christian and un-American)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As I recall, Mills was given immunity because she was ostensibly Clinton’s lawyer...but she really wasn’t. These immunity deals stunk to high heaven.
To: Oldeconomybuyer
All the immunity granted and nobody charged. OBAMUGABE was a currupt thug.
19 posted on
11/14/2017 6:31:42 PM PST by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....Dirty Bob Mueller)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
