Skip to comments.
[FLASHBACK]. Five Clinton aides received immunity deals in FBI probe
Washington Examiner ^
| September 23, 2016
| By Sarah Westeood
Posted on 11/14/2017 4:35:02 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Why? Do these immunity deals apply today?
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
2
posted on
11/14/2017 4:39:59 PM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
3
posted on
11/14/2017 4:40:00 PM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
These deals are evidence that the investigation was criminally compromised.
4
posted on
11/14/2017 4:40:01 PM PST
by
Triple
(Socialism denies people the right to the fruits of their labor, and is as abhorrent as slavery)
To: Triple
Hey Triple, you can say that Triple times.
5
posted on
11/14/2017 4:51:13 PM PST
by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: Triple
They are evidence of a conspiracy to obstruct justice...
6
posted on
11/14/2017 4:52:05 PM PST
by
Hotlanta Mike
("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Usually one receives immunity for testifying against another person. Such was not the case here. Further, these witnesses were allowed to destroy evidence as part of this immunity.
7
posted on
11/14/2017 4:54:52 PM PST
by
Hotlanta Mike
("You can avoid reality, but you can't avoid the consequences of avoiding reality.")
To: Oldeconomybuyer
What does that deal have to do with uranium is my question.
8
posted on
11/14/2017 4:58:46 PM PST
by
enduserindy
( I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
Why give so much immunity if no crimes were committed?
Why cut loose little fish if you aren’t going after bigger fish?
Why tolerate the biggest fish’s lies and disrespectful mocking answers about wiping servers with rags?
9
posted on
11/14/2017 4:58:57 PM PST
by
a fool in paradise
(Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
10
posted on
11/14/2017 4:59:08 PM PST
by
timestax
To: timestax
11
posted on
11/14/2017 5:01:45 PM PST
by
timestax
To: Oldeconomybuyer
President Trump needs to read 1 Kings chapter 2.
To: timestax
The DOJ is a corrupt cesspool and Sessions is doing nothing to reverse the damage done by Holder/Lynch. His appointment will go down as President Trump’s biggest mistake.
To: a fool in paradise
14
posted on
11/14/2017 5:08:22 PM PST
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As immunity against prosecution, the grants seem to apply. So they cannot be prosecuted. However, my understanding is that immunity now requires them to testify (since they cannot be prosecuted) and if they refuse to give testimony they will be cited for contempt. They are not immune from contempt charges.
This seems to mean they may be required to testify against Hillary and Bill.
15
posted on
11/14/2017 5:24:54 PM PST
by
Rapscallion
(Politics just makes us hate each other. It's un-christian and un-American)
To: Rapscallion
I’m a civil lawyer but that’s what I remember from law school
16
posted on
11/14/2017 5:33:17 PM PST
by
STJPII
To: Oldeconomybuyer
As I recall, Mills was given immunity because she was ostensibly Clinton’s lawyer...but she really wasn’t. These immunity deals stunk to high heaven.
To: Rapscallion
I was just going to post the exact same thing - thank you for saving me the trouble.
Yup. Get them all on the witness stand under oath. One lie and they can be imprisoned. Immunity is only for the case with Hillary.
Go for it.
18
posted on
11/14/2017 6:28:50 PM PST
by
Arlis
To: Oldeconomybuyer
All the immunity granted and nobody charged. OBAMUGABE was a currupt thug.
19
posted on
11/14/2017 6:31:42 PM PST
by
King Moonracer
(Bad lighting and cheap fabric, that's how you sell clothing.....Dirty Bob Mueller)
To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...
20
posted on
11/14/2017 11:36:33 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
