The 16 year old has revealed his autograph (possibly a fake), in her yearbook. If this autograph was given after the incident, that becomes VERY problematic to her claim.
If he forced some 16 year old to do something she didn’t want, I couldn’t support him.
Part of her story was that he locked the doors and she couldn’t get out of the car.
Door locks generally prevent people from getting in, not out. Some models back then could have had a child-lock block on unlocking the door. Again, we’d have to know more to see if her claims could possibly be true.
I want to know if these women are getting money.
This goes to character, devotion to their current political leanings, and other things that might impact this.
the bottom line is all these accusers vanish into the woodwork after they accomplish “politics of personal destruction”
I am actually more offended at the power the media has to attack us, and we don't even try smashing them to splinters yet.
Our leadership is supine and cowardly.
The door lock part of the story is easily falsifiable. Information about what type of locks his make/model/year of car he had at the time is easily verified by any competent auto repair shop.
And child safe locks only work on rear passenger doors. They don’t exist on front passenger doors because small children aren’t supposed to be sitting in the front.
Some models back then could have had a child-lock block on unlocking the door.
Not on the front passenger door. Child locks are on the back doors only.
the autograph was supposedlt 1-2 weeks before the alleged incident. if there was such an incident i think 99% of women would cut out or deface-damage his writing in their yearbook a reminder of such a terrible asttacki..
and what man who is not dead drunk and does not have a knife at her throat, a gun at her head or otherwise beaten her into submission is going to try and put his manhood in her mouth? one bite and its over forever..this was before miracle surgeries...