“Everyone should, but there needs to be a lot more proof before I’m going to turn on Moore.”
I agree.
If this is true I think it is pure pragmatism, not based on Moore having “done it” or not.
I don’t know, but the idea is elect Sessions via write-in, get a new attorney general. This based not on Moore’ “guilt” but on concern the smear is working. Substituting Sessions in this scenario would lessen the chance the Dem might win.
In this scenario Moore would have to be on board and endorse Sessions.
All that said, I have no idea if this report is true or not.
I agree with your thoughts there.
This is a mess, but I lean toward it being a contrivance.