[TwelveOfTwenty]

A month after canceling to appear at a dinner to honor Brett Ratner, Gal Gadot still has a lot to say about the famed director and the accusations mounting against him.

Have the accusations against him been proven true?

Not that I doubt it, but we do have this presumption of innocence until proven guilty that everyone is willing to ignore lately.

[ClearCase_guy]

presumption of innocence

That is an important principle in arenas like the courtroom and, in my opinion, a political campaign.

But this is just business. Nothing needs to be proven. This is just, "I hear bad things. I don't want to do business with that guy" (at a minimum). That happens all the time. I see nothing wrong with it.

[Bryanw92]

>>Not that I doubt it, but we do have this presumption of innocence until proven guilty that everyone is willing to ignore lately.

The next stage in the culture war against men is that all allegations are true when sex is involved.

[UnwashedPeasant]

"presumption of innocence until proven guilty"

She probably has a lot of inside info. Hollywood is a small town.

[bigdaddy45]

“proven guilty” requires a trial. There will be no trial. But the allegations are persistent enough that its obvious the guy is a creep.

[Yaelle]

we do have this presumption of innocence until proven guilty that everyone is willing to ignore lately.

---

In criminal justice.

There is no reason a company needs to keep a perv on staff if there are allegations of impropriety. Many businesses including entertainment still have morality clauses or even just the ability to fire anyone from the project for any reason.