The accusation of providing liquor at a restaurant has been debunked by noting the county in which this purportedly happened was dry at the time of the date and could not have happened.
It should also be noted that te accusation was she was served in a restaurant. Not even a reasonable lie since it would have been the waitstaff acting under cover of law that purportedly provided liquor to a minor, not the judge.
Etowah County appears to have gone wet by referendum in 1972.
https://www.newspapers.com/newspage/115162329/
Besides any Southern woman worth her salt should be able to handle a few drinks at the age of eighteen. Dry county or not. By college she should be able to find the best hootch and get gloriously smackered without letting the seams of her stocking come askew then show up for church service in the morning bright as a daisy.
“The accusation of providing liquor at a restaurant has been debunked by noting the county in which this purportedly happened was dry at the time of the date and could not have happened.”
Now that right there is one of the most compelling arguments I’v seen against the truth of the smear.
A good, successful con artist is smart. Gotta be.
These lefty looters are not smart. Gonna fail.
Link?Some of us are old enough to remember before the advent of MADD when drunk driving was not nearly as dimly regarded as it now (properly) is. That would not have been the case in a dry county, tho, I’m sure.
But JLAGRAYFOX asserts that the age of consent, and the age of legal marriage with parental consent, were lower in Alabama thirty years ago than now.