It affects the reality of the pupose and reliability of this site, if nothing else. Since LS quit posting on this subject, after his theories and failed predictions started being questioned more stringently, most of the Mueller cheerleading has subsided. He is/was somewhat of a cult hero here, but even sacred cows can be wrong at tiimes, or get too full of themselves.
I for one would love to have egg on my face and their narrative be the reality. I just do not buy it though....I think if Mueller were actually an honorable man, he would have recused himself for his implications in Uranium One. That he in fact needs to be the one being questioned, and not the one asking the questions. With that looming over his head I do not know how anything he does can be considered honest or fair, at this point.
On these points we completely agree. Please remember that next time you feel I'm too aggressively perusing those defending Mueller. I'm behaving no differently than a Sean Hannity, a Mark Levin or a Laura Ingraham would be if they were in my shoes as well. It's about getting to the truth by debate, not letting BS fly and potentially stick.
All is good, attack the message, but not the messenger. That is my motto at getting to the truth. I think all i all we agree on this subject. 8>)