Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ESPN's New Social Media Policy: "Don't Embroil The Company in Unwanted Contrroversy"
Deadspin ^ | November 3, 2017 | Laura Wagner

Posted on 11/03/2017 9:51:44 AM PDT by EdnaMode

ESPN distributed new social media guidelines to its employees Thursday, which reinforced some existing rules about not breaking news exclusively on social media, respecting colleagues, and—oh wait, here’s a new thing: “Do nothing that would undercut your colleagues’ work or embroil the company in unwanted controversy.”

The “unwanted” there is doing a lot of work. Unwanted for whom? The employee who feels so strongly about an issue, perhaps the direction his or her employer is going, that they use Twitter to provide their insight? Of course not. The controversies are “unwanted” for ESPN executives, who want to keep advertisers happy, avoid offending anyone at all costs, and protect the bottom line.

Given the obvious and probably intentional ambiguity and subjectivity of “unwanted controversy,” the next line—“We reserve the right to take action for violations of these principles”—seems quite clear. ESPN now has more explicit latitude than ever to silence its employees.

The best part of the report announcing the guidelines was ESPN President John Skipper offering the definitely true and not at all disingenuous claim that the updated guidelines were not a response to recent “unwanted controversies” surrounding Jemele Hill and Sam Ponder’s recent tweets. (Hill accurately called Donald Trump a racist and explained how capitalism works, earning her a two-week suspension. Ponder sarcastically welcomed Barstool Sports personalities to ESPN after the site that had called her a slut and said her only job was to “make men hard” got a pass from the network, which led to the network canceling Barstool’s show.)

“It’s all intertwined with a moment in our culture and our political environment of polarization,” Skipper said, per Sports Business Journal. “It’s the right time to do it. We would never react to one incident or two incidents and say, ‘Oh my gosh, we’ve got to look.’ It’s a unique moment in time.”

It’s “unique” because two notable female ESPN employees spoke their minds and ESPN felt threatened in some way, but okay.

Because everyone was waiting to hear what the dumbest person alive thought about all of this, ESPN’s public editor Jim Brady mashed his hands together in support:

I think this an important addition to the guidelines, even if there’s not a specific policy point included in the passage. The other option was to opt for a long, imposing, very specific set of guidelines that would likely have been impossible to police, and could have prompted ESPN staffers to decide social media wasn’t worth the effort. The tone of social media these days may be nastier than ever, but this too will likely pass, and — even outside the minute-to-minute political wars being fought on Twitter and Facebook — social media platforms remain very valuable ways for ESPN to build audience and loyalty.

Of course, he did not discuss the fact that the “controversies” around Hill’s tweet, and Ponder being forced to voice her concerns regarding Barstool’s place at the network, were manufactured by ESPN in the first place.


TOPICS: Sports; TV/Movies
KEYWORDS: controversy; espn; espnratings; jamelehill; jamelshill; samponder; socialmedia; sports; sportscenter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
Ummmmm too late!
1 posted on 11/03/2017 9:51:44 AM PDT by EdnaMode
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

I suppose “Just read the damn scores and keep your opinions to yourself” didn’t make the list...


2 posted on 11/03/2017 9:53:49 AM PDT by bigbob (People say believe half of what you see son and none of what you hear - M. Gaye)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

“UNWANTED CONTROVERSY” = DemocRAT crimes.


3 posted on 11/03/2017 9:54:21 AM PDT by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

http://nypost.com/2017/10/17/no-one-worse-than-sam-ponder-espnerbarstool-tension-grows/

Probably more about Sam Ponder than Hill knowing ESPN...


4 posted on 11/03/2017 9:55:10 AM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Kinda late for all that isn’t it?


5 posted on 11/03/2017 9:57:33 AM PDT by V_TWIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
ESPBSN

ESNPRN

ESDNCN

...too late to make amends...you should have wore Depends.

6 posted on 11/03/2017 9:57:46 AM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (FUMSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

This is the same policy the almost EVERY responsible business has for their employees. The one addendem that is necessary:

1a. Do not be a racist and make exceptions for black employees because you want to be thought of as “enlightened”. Expect the same standard for all employees regardless of race or gender.


7 posted on 11/03/2017 9:57:51 AM PDT by jimmygrace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
Hill accurately called Donald Trump a racist and explained how capitalism works

First, Trump isn't a racist. Second, Hill doesn't have the slightest idea how capitalism works.

8 posted on 11/03/2017 9:59:25 AM PDT by jalisco555 ("In a Time of Universal Deceit Telling the Truth Is a Revolutionary Act" - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode
I thought they've been all for "controversy" for the last ten years. Sports is too boring. We need a bunch of SJWs to lecture our audience about white privilege and Black Lives Matter.

Now all of a sudden it's "we don't want to get embroiled in unwanted controversy". I don't get it.

9 posted on 11/03/2017 9:59:45 AM PDT by Steely Tom ([Seth Rich] == [the Democrat's John Dean])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

No kidding!

But, it’s a sign that there is some really big trouble coming financially to ESPN. Lost jobs, restructuring...mistakes were made...

I’ll never...and I mean EVER watch ESPN, NFL, or NBA again in my life. And at one time I was a very dedicated fan. Today? I don’t give a rats...


10 posted on 11/03/2017 10:08:03 AM PDT by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Professional

Hill Cheers Pizza Hut and blast Papa John’s on twitter over NFL


11 posted on 11/03/2017 10:14:01 AM PDT by scooby321 (o even lower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

And yet the feminazi Sarah Spain tweeted her support for the rogue ex employee who shut down our POTUS twitter, labeling him a hero.

She is such a lightweight pos, was making stuff up out of whole cloth during the lie regarding Patrick kane’s fraudulent rape accuser.


12 posted on 11/03/2017 10:15:18 AM PDT by AllAmericanGirl44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

Fire all the leftist blabbermouths and start over.


13 posted on 11/03/2017 10:16:00 AM PDT by BigEdLB (To Dimwitocrats: We won. You lost. Get used to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

So when are they going to enforce that rule and fire half their staff?


14 posted on 11/03/2017 10:19:05 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

“ESPN’s New Social Media Policy: “Don’t Embroil The Company in Unwanted Contrroversy””

I wonder what they would consider “wanted” controversy?


15 posted on 11/03/2017 10:22:29 AM PDT by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

They don’t even have the “Or Else” option.

Lame, lame, lame.


16 posted on 11/03/2017 10:34:33 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot (Pravda + Useful Idiots = USSR; Journ0List + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

Guess their Sarah Spain creature is exempt or must fall into the “wanted” category of political activity as her tweet today about Trump continues ESPN’s hatefest towards all things Conservative and Right.


17 posted on 11/03/2017 10:36:13 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

All positive comments about the opponent are unwanted.
All negative comments about my team are unwanted.

This new policy kills all color commentary. ESPN can cut its staff budget and have only one person describing the game itself and nothing more.


18 posted on 11/03/2017 10:42:44 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

ESPN is trying to sweep the “Unwanted Controversies” under the media carpet. Too late the viewers have already seen them.


19 posted on 11/03/2017 10:50:08 AM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord. Psalm 33:12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdnaMode

That horse has already left the barn.


20 posted on 11/03/2017 10:50:40 AM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson