Twin Peaks – Resist Snitch Disclosure To Bitter End

Radio Legendary ^ | 11/2/2017

[Elderberry]

The issue that has torn this city’s public safety services in two once again figured in a major felony case.

Disclosure of confidential informants is so repugnant to police and fire department officials they will sacrifice entire blocks of prosecution in order to preserve the sacrosanct status of snitches.

The policy is so ingrained it has caused a complete shakeup in the structure of upper leadership – the replacement of the Chiefs of Police and Fire Departments – and the ouster of seasoned investigators who won’t budge on the issue, one way or the other.

All that bitter history came crashing down on Wednesday during a conference in the Judge’s chambers of the 54th Criminal District Court when the Honorable Matt Johnson made a decision that rocked and shocked the law enforcement and biker communities.

[TexasGator]

But have to ever stayed at a Holiday Inn?

[Strac6]

Of course they can have an opinion, even when they support drug-dealing, murdering, motorcycle gang scum

[bgill]

No, you be very careful of calling FRiends drug dealers and gang members.

The police went to Waco and killed a bunch of people. That’s a fact. Proven by forensics.

[bgill]

Ah, another Floridian. Two Floridians on these threads who call FRiends nasty names. Very interesting.

[TexasGator]

“The police went to Waco and killed a bunch of people. “

Even bikers there said the police acted professionally and saved lives that day. And that is a fact!

[TexasGator]

“Ah, another Floridian. Two Floridians on these threads who call FRiends nasty names. Very interesting”

LOL! I have been slurred hastily beyond compare here by the gangsters supporters!

[TexasGator]

“The police went to Waco “

You have it backwards! The bandidos went to Waco!

[TexasGator]

“Rather than sit outside with rifles, they should have walked around in uniform in the Twin Peaks. Instead they waited outside waiting”

If I remember correctly they wanted to go inside but were told not to by TP management.

[cpdiii]

The Cossacks and the Banditos are both thugs. I mourn not those killed. I have a real problem with the judicial process being applied to them. Something “aint right” in Waco.

[Strac6]

“Ah, another Floridian. Two Floridians on these threads who call FRiends nasty names. Very interesting.”

I didn’t call ant FReepers names, unless they are part of the drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs, and I assume no one has any trouble with me calling drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs out as drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs

[Strac6]

The “ain’t right” is BS PR being spread here, in some cases, by convicted felons.

[Strac6]

Yes, you are right. They killed drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gang members who were actively shooting other drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gang members, and the drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gang member’s bullets were barely missing families there for a quiet Sunday.

Cops shot active shooters. Problem with that?

[Strac6]

So according to you, LEOs should not have been there and just let the drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs shoot it out, and hit families like your with stray bullets in the process.

Brilliant logic, just brilliant.

[Strac6]

I didn’t call any FReepers names, unless they are part of the drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs, and I assume no one has any trouble with me calling drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs out as drug-dealing, murdering motorcycle gangs

[bgill]

Yes, I do have a problem with intentionally executing them in a fish bowl. Yes, I do have a problem with them being set up. Yes, I do have a problem with liars like Sgt. Swanson. Yes, I do have a problem with FReepers being called drug dealers.

[Strac6]

Sorry, did not call FReepers drug dealers.

On the rest, you are 100% right. Cops made them come there, made them bring more than 100 guns, made them start shooting each other, and, yes, they are all innocent, just as OJ and Casey Anthony were

[BlueDragon]

Cops shot active shooters. Problem with that?

The first guy that LE shot was leaning against the patio railing with his hands in his pockets. Lab techs have identified which particular .223 was used to shoot the man right in the face.

Beyond the four that lab techs have verified that were shot by LE, there is yet one more man who was shot in the back of one thigh -- and who had been shot twice previously, and that last (the third) entry wound large, and ill-shaped ragged-like which could coincide with a .223 round keyholing (going in sideways) due to having stuck some object prior to penetrating the back of the man's leg. It was that last shot that severed an artery causing the man to bleed to death. When shot the third time that man was moving away, noticeably limping away from other fighting that was going on, appearing to be trying to separate himself.

See the chain? that's all the man had (he had no gun, and was not a shooter) and he may have begun swinging it to keep attackers off himself only after he had been shot once, then a second time ---prior to a third shot figuratively 'dropping' him at the base of that pole he was moving toward. It's possible a .223 round glanced off the chain (if not something yet else) turned sideways, then entered his leg -- exiting out the front side due to not striking bone or being otherwise stopped.

Whatever bullet entered last, it left a large, elongated gouge of an entry wound (instead of a round hole) before exiting somewhere out the front ---to be never recovered, despite all the fine-tooth comb metal detecting searching that LE spent the better part of a week or more at conducting.

So --there is one at least who was not a shooter (the one who was shot in the chin with a .223 while leaning against the patio railing with his hands in his pockets) and possibly this other man also who was not a shooter who would a be fifth overall that LE shot (either on purpose, or accidentally -- having missed some other target) and possibly one of at least two who were not as you say; "actively shooting" .

That there is at least one who police killed outright who was not a shooter -- renders your claim that police shot only those who were "actively shooting" to be error, if not deliberate lie on your part.

Personally, if you're not a FED come here to FR to try to steer public sentiments ---then it must be that you're just lazy (too lazy to search out, and take note of anything that would challenge your own personal biases) and sloppy when it comes to stating actual facts, yourself relying on intimidation to try to get people to believe things that are just not *quite* true -- but need to be -- or else you'd need apologize (or else admit to yourself that the Agency you may be working for is made up a lie-telling shit-heels who themselves have blood of innocents on their hands -- like the blood of Geoffrey Brady, among others).

motorcycle gang member’s bullets were barely missing families there for a quiet Sunday.

Interestingly enough, the prosecution rested it's case against Carrizal without bringing any of those "families" to the witness stand.

One would think if bullets were "barely missing" "families", then multiple family members of multiple families (you did use plural sense) would, or at least could have been called to testify. If not called to testify, but had provided statements to law enforcement (or else directly to the DA's Office) then these "families" would be (should be, anyway) on a list of potential witnesses who may even have information that could exonerate a particular defendant, or defendants, thus under both Brady vs. Maryland and the Morton Act would need have their identities and whatever statements they had given to LE provided to the various (and many!) defense attorneys.

So far, the only talk about "families" has come from LE color commentator types who can't establish that particular claim. Guys like -- Swanton...and apologists for guys like Swanton and Reyna who turn immediately to insulting freepers here (calling them "gang members", and worse) whenever people around here call them out for their b.s.

When I saw the headline of this latest article -- I KNEW it would draw you out.

I've been a freeper for many many years. I have seen 'em come, and I've seen 'em go...

FReepers, be very careful.

The one known to us here as 'Strac6' is quite possibly a Federal Agent.

His sign-up date, and his initial postings on this 'Waco, Twin Peaks biker' subject matter fit with being a Federal (or possibly even only State) agent of some type who has personal interest in the legal process bringing pressure to bear on the 155 154 indicted (one has died after having been indicted) to beg for some form of plea bargain rather than risk being convicted (rightly, and more to the point -- wrongly convicted) and thus face possibly life sentence.

[BlueDragon]

The “ain’t right” is BS PR being spread here, in some cases, by convicted felons.

Oh really?

And who's the "convicted felon" around here?

Go ahead, here's your chance to throw everyone off the scent and accuse me (of being a convicted felon).

But you said felons with an "s", as in multiple felons.

That means that even if you did falsely accuse little old me (to throw everyone off the scent that you have inside information on freepers that you've been gathering -- and doing so quite possibly without having warrant to do so, etc.) there must be yet somebody else.

Who would that be? Has someone here confessed to having been convicted of a felony at some time in the past -- and had posted criticism of McLennan County DA's office, and maybe had speculated about it seeming to be there must have been a hidden hand type of 'FED' level law enforcement agency that had been working to stir up animosities between the two rival MC's?

Got a spreadsheet with freeper names for that kind of thing, do you? It must be that, or else you're pulling it out of that dank hole of yours...

Tell us who this "convicted felon" is, while you tell us also what your previous freep-name was.

[Strac6]

Wow. You sure have a lot of time on your hands.

Sorry, but all your points are def lawyer BS.

America would be a better place if you used that time helping kids get off drugs, rather than B.S. defending those who sell them the drugs.

Re: Being a Fed, BIOYAC !

[Strac6]

Wow.. you sure love drug dealers and hate cops...