Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Click on the link to see all the pics, videos and other clickable links.
1 posted on 11/01/2017 12:10:53 AM PDT by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker

We are not going to the stars considering the distances involved. Mars, yes. Flybyes to Jupiter and Saturn. Probably. Neptune, Pluto (Yes, I’m old school), Uranus. No reason to go there. Satellites have done the job this year.

Venus - too hot. Mercury - Way to hot.

Moons around the planets. Some, yes. Some are dangerous.

This all assumes that mankind is still around in the near future. With No. Korea and Iran still unleashed, I’m not taking any bets.


2 posted on 11/01/2017 12:24:09 AM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

for later...


3 posted on 11/01/2017 12:44:19 AM PDT by GOPJ ( http://fakehatecrimes.org/ - List of fake hate crimes against traditional/conservative Americans)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Whether it works or not it won’t let us reach the stars. It might get us to Mars.

Well, it will let us reach the stars if it works, but not in an efficient time span.

Personally I don’t believe any human that will ever exist will feel the light of an alien star on their skin.


4 posted on 11/01/2017 12:48:40 AM PDT by FreedomStar3028 (Somebody has to step forward and do what is right because it is right, otherwise no one will follow.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Thanks for posting. (In)credible science.


6 posted on 11/01/2017 1:38:26 AM PDT by steve86 (Prophecies of Maelmhaedhoc O'Morgair (Latin form: Malachy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I’ve been following the EM drive for years and the only successful tests registered thrust below the margin for measurement error. It’s not real.


7 posted on 11/01/2017 1:38:38 AM PDT by JohnyBoy (We should forgive communists, but not before they are hanged.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

I thought the effect was well understood.

The effect appears to be the result of enthalpy conservation in a moving frame of reference.

In a vortex, the outer edges of the system moves at a higher velocity than at the axis.

In an EmDrive I would expect that radiation emitted from the wide end of the cone to transfer more kinetic energy from radiation pressure than the radiation emitted from the narrow end of the cone.


11 posted on 11/01/2017 2:33:32 AM PDT by unlearner (You will never come to know that which you do not know until you first know that you do not know it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Bookmark.


12 posted on 11/01/2017 3:00:50 AM PDT by SunTzuWu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Back in the day I had a D&D Spelljammer ship that had a similar means of propulsion.

Magic from my youth becomes science of today.


14 posted on 11/01/2017 3:51:11 AM PDT by themidnightskulker (And then the thread dies... peacefully, in it's sleep....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
the mysterious, "impossible" EmDrive propulsion system

Is it impossible or just highly improbable? Maybe a cup of really hot tea?

15 posted on 11/01/2017 4:01:41 AM PDT by Dad was my hero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

400 years ago out-of-control European explorers violated he rights of indigenous America. Now FReepers are excited to violate the rights of rocks and minerals on new frontiers. :)


16 posted on 11/01/2017 4:26:30 AM PDT by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker
Forget the "EM Drive." What we need is the "Infinite Improbability Drive!"

Mark

19 posted on 11/01/2017 4:38:01 AM PDT by MarkL (Do I really look like a guy with a plan?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Has anyone calculated how long it takes to get up to the speed of light without putting humans under unnatural G forces? Then, calculate the time it takes to slow down. Our present natural gravitational force is 16 feet/second squared.


22 posted on 11/01/2017 5:01:22 AM PDT by jonrick46 (Trump continues to have all the right enemies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: LibWhacker

Even if this works, what power source is used to generate the MW field? How much current is needed to create and effective thrust? How efficient is it? Does it require a power cord running to a nuclear station on earth ( sarc)?

If the force produced is in fact real, how “forceful” is it? ( Will it take moments or years to accelerate to useful velocity?)

Why not invent diLithium crystals and Warp dives? Or even impulse drives? We could plod along at .5 C at least, in “ limp home” mode. Oh, yeah, and invent hibernation too, or else we need cattle and hydroponic fields to tag along for the eons it would take to get anywhere....

2001 (a Space Odyssey) is already 16 years past and here we are still anchored to earth. C’mon scientists, get off your fourth points of contact!

Respectfully,

Luddite


29 posted on 11/01/2017 7:47:48 AM PDT by Manly Warrior (US ARMY (Ret), "No Free Lunches for the Dogs of War")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson