Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: CatOwner
That's what I like about Opera/ScriptSafe. Once you figure out which sites to blacklist (either specific pages or the whole domain), you never have to deal with them again.

NoScript is "mostly" a whitelist-based blocker and, by default, blocks all active content from everywhere. NoScript also allows a form of blacklisting that sounds the same as what you are talking about. NoScript calls it marking them explicitly as "untrusted." There is no operational difference between NoScript blocking a site because you have marked it untrusted vs. blocking it because it has not been whitelisted. However, when you pop up the list of stuff that NoScript is blocking on some page, it leaves out the stuff that you have already marked as untrusted. As you say, you never have to deal with them again. (If you need to see the untrusted stuff on some page, you can click on the "Untrusted" submenu on the popup listing of what it is blocking.)

Is ScriptSafe strictly an Opera goodie, or is it something I can experiment with in the browsers I am considering (Pale Moon, Waterfox, Chrome)?

50 posted on 10/26/2017 9:59:26 PM PDT by snarkpup (The swamp is draining; and the alligators are allegating.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: snarkpup
Is ScriptSafe strictly an Opera goodie, or is it something I can experiment with in the browsers I am considering (Pale Moon, Waterfox, Chrome)?

According to the developer, there is a version for Opera, and there is a version for Chrome/Chromium/Vivaldi and other derivatives.

https://www.andryou.com/scriptsafe/

54 posted on 10/26/2017 10:05:59 PM PDT by CatOwner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson