Posted on 10/26/2017 7:26:25 AM PDT by MNDude
A few weeks ago, president Trump appeared with a dozen military leaders where he announced to the press that it was the Calm before the storm. It seems clear now that he was talking about uranium one and dossier Revelations.
I am pretty certain he has known about all of this for many weeks, possibly since the beginning of his presidency. He does not intend this to be just another Donald Trump tweet that may or may not capture the media's attention. He's going to go big.
So my question is, why all of the military leaders? Are they only symbolic that he is about to begin War against the corrupt deep Staters? Or could the military actually become involved with action against guilty parties. What are your thoughts?
Those two are sitting on immunity deals. IMO
I wouldn’t say ‘much’ just a pessimistic few that are very vocal. I hope that by this time next year they will be all forced to shut off the waterworks after Trump and his cabinet proves that they are in it to win it.
The Donald wasn’t just blowing smoke when he looked Hillary in the eye and said “You’d be in jail!” if he were in charge.
Well, now he is in charge - but he needs to make sure that he covers all bases so that nothing gets tossed on appeal. He is quietly building up an iron-solid dossier on the Clinton Crime Network - and he might even have some surprises for the halfrican non-American who will likely be living out the remainder of his days in Dubai.
In a nominal defense, how many times have we had smoking gun evidence for an independent prosecutor to bring charges against Bill and Hillary, and Obama, and Lynch, and Holder, and Lerner, and, and, and...only for them to skate.
The cynicism is born of experience.
Hmmm indeed
I don’t think he’d want to make a reality show moment out of a war.
Or it could be that Trump, who attended a military academy but never served, is simply infatuated with people who wear stars on their collars.
...But you’d entertain the notion that he’d make a war out of a domestic reality show. The military’s not there to scare or detain Democrats.
The presence of military people is to be expected around a commander in chief fighting a war on terrorism and dealing with one country that’s been trained to chuck missiles when it wants freebies on one side, and a nation that’s run by a guy who has expressed a desire to recreate the USSR on the other, and a third country with a nuclear arsenal that is expansionist and currently undergoing transformation back to tighter communist control...a Chinese dictatorship.
Uranium One is about Iran. Iran, Russia, China and the Norks are linked in their nuclear development. Pakistan, home of Democrat congress ITs, was too, via the Qadeer Khan Network.
Even without weapons to worry about energy alone is a national security issue.
Russians, Norks and Iranians respect power and are more apt to respect a president surrounded by military men than one surrounded with homosexuals and emotionally unhinged liberal women.
If you are respected then war is less likely because bullies prefer easy targets to the potential of getting their butts kicked.
I think that investigations of the Clintons will go all the way back to the crimes committed while Bill was president. I also think that we will eventually be hearing about the use of intelligence assets in the united states to kill people, over the years. These people that have endangered the Clintons illegal enterprises and then died suddenly.
>>>The cynicism is born of experience.<<<
Well, when you have an elitist government for the past 20 years what do you expect?
There is a new sheriff in town.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mgH94B656g
Mark Taylor – Military Tribunals Coming for the Wicked
The corruption and intellectual dishonesty run very deep and wide. There are crimes that “conservatives” and “patriots” refuse to discuss.
Carter, and every President between Reagan and Trump, have all been globalist, NWO, totalitarian, No Borders abortionists. The two Bushes WHILE IN OFFICE did an excellent impersonation of pro-lifers.
I hope that the status quo of letting them skate comes to an end.
I want the Clintons (both of them) face substantial charges including treason. Enough so that it will bankrupt them paying the lawyers.
Maybe he thinks uranium sale was treason. Looking into a military tribunal since the FBI and DOJ were involved in the cover-up?
LOL. Good one.
Drudge has also not reported anything on Uranium One? Or did I miss it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.