Frank Gaffney: Mueller Has Been ‘Absolutely, Indisputably’ Compromised by Latest Clinton-Russia

Breitbart ^ | Oct 25, 2017 | John Hayward

[bitt]

Center for Security Policy President Frank Gaffney joined SiriusXM host Raheem Kassam on Wednesday’s Breitbart News Daily to talk about the latest revelations regarding the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee, the politicized Obama Justice Department, and actual collusion with Russia in the 2016 presidential campaign. Gaffney said the current news environment provided a “target-rich environment” for punditry, but was regrettably “hard on the country.”

“I particularly am thinking of this dossier business and the attacks on Donald Trump that have been relentlessly pursued,” he said. “Interestingly enough, with the help – in some cases more than just help, the active participation – of some people who have prominently featured in an actual case of Russian collusion at the highest levels of the United States government.”

[FreeReign]

Who is disputing that?

I listed two simple facts.

You said I was citing narratives, headlines, and jumping to conclusions.

Now you say that you are not disputing what I said.

Great!

[.45 Long Colt]

All I said was that people need to pump the brakes where Mueller and Sessions are concerned. I say that because no one knows the big picture. We don’t what they are doing or why. I’m not defending either. I’m urging caution before jumping to conclusions or making demands.

[FreeReign]

I’m urging caution before jumping to conclusions or making demands.

I'm not jumping to any conclusions.

But there is one demand we all should be making. It's time for Sessions to appoint a solid Special Prosecutor (not Mueller)to pursue the Uranium One case.

[.45 Long Colt]

I think the difference between us is I believe there is an investigatory plan in place and they have been working the plan for months. I trust the process.

[Jimmy Valentine]

Mueller is also implicated in the Uranium One scandal. That one will bring down the House.

[trebb]

Exactly - it turns out there is a whole complex mish-mash of inter-connectivity in almost everything we have been hearing/talking about over the past year and it keeps getting more convoluted by the day. It will take some serious unraveling and putting ducks in a row to attend to this correctly...

[politicianslie]

I’m an attorney so I know something about the ethics rules. I also know something about investigations, having been involved in them.

As an attorney, do you also know anything about covering up information to hide crimes?

[.45 Long Colt]

My point is you don’t know what he’s actually done, you don’t know if he’s operating under a grant of immunity, you don’t know the big picture. And to be clear, neither do I. I’m not defending Mueller. I don’t like him and I don’t trust him, but perhaps, just perhaps, he’s doing exactly what Trump and the AG want him to be doing. It’s way too early to know how this will go. If it takes Mueller going free to nail any combination of Hillary, Bill, the Podestas, Comey, Holder, Lynch, Obama, and other DNC lackeys, then I’m all for Mueller having immunity and going free.

In the end, I was simply cautioning about jumping to conclusions about what’s going on behind the scenes. My instincts is that Trump, Sessions, and a few others have have been working a plan from the outset.