[fireman15]

Other than some complaints in the comment sections... one thing that is missing in nearly all the reviews from the time period when the first iPhone was released is any mention of the "multitouch sensor". I guess that strangely the reviewers didn't realize that this was going to be the feature that Swordmaker would claim ten years later made the phone “revolutionary”.

One of the reasons I have been debating this with Swordmaker on this thread... is that I hate it when history is rewritten to fit a corporate mythology that is mostly not true. I realize that when the corporation is the largest by monetary value in the history of the world and has nearly limitless resources and the slickest PR People in history... that this is bound to be a losing battle. But someone should make an effort to fight this type of propaganda. Shouldn't they?

[Swordmaker]

one thing that is missing in nearly all the reviews from the time period when the first iPhone was released is any mention of the "multitouch sensor".

No one talked about a "multitouch sensor" because that Is NOT WHAT IS WAS CALLED, fireman15. It was a "multitouch screen," and it was mentioned in every review I saw in the period. There was no such thing as a "multitouch sensor" because that is a misnomer that you would never find. Again, you don't even comprehend the technology.

One of the reasons I have been debating this with Swordmaker on this thread... is that I hate it when history is rewritten to fit a corporate mythology that is mostly not true.

The ONLY ONE attempting to rewrite history and spreading propaganda on this thread is YOU.

Now, I broke my determination not to address you again, but this one was so egregious it could not be left standing. I'm done.