she has high standards and im sure that is difficult for some to adjust to...
1 posted on
10/23/2017 10:03:32 AM PDT by
drewh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
To: drewh
Laura is not on board the Cheap Labor Express.
Most of Fox News is, that’s the problem.
2 posted on
10/23/2017 10:04:41 AM PDT by
Lurkinanloomin
(Natural Born Citizen Means Born Here Of Citizen Parents - Know Islam, No Peace -No Islam, Know Peace)
To: drewh
3 posted on
10/23/2017 10:06:57 AM PDT by
Fido969
(In!)
To: drewh
Seems like they’re going out of there way to find something wrong.
4 posted on
10/23/2017 10:07:22 AM PDT by
EdnaMode
To: drewh
This means obviously she is successful, that she doesn’t go with the Fox libRINO flow, and that she will kill it in the ratings.
5 posted on
10/23/2017 10:07:52 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
To: drewh
Good grief. More fake news from the Left.
6 posted on
10/23/2017 10:08:36 AM PDT by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: drewh
Trying to spike the show before it even starts.
7 posted on
10/23/2017 10:08:56 AM PDT by
facedown
(Armed in the Heartland)
To: drewh
Always enjoyed her commentary, but would not be surprised if it’s true that she’s not very nice behind the scenes.
I noticed a change in her on-air demeanor/persona, after her radio show “took off” around 2004 or so, and subscribers started to boost her income significantly.
8 posted on
10/23/2017 10:09:25 AM PDT by
simpson96
To: drewh
Few remember that once Beck left Fox, Laura briefly got a 5pm show on Fox. It was awful. She started each show with what was supposed to be humorous observations on the day’s used. They weren’t very funny at all. And her stiff personality didn’t help.
I think she’s matured a bit and will be successful with the new show.
To: drewh
Personally I expect Laura to have a hugely successful show on Fox. For me it will be Must Watch TV.
12 posted on
10/23/2017 10:14:13 AM PDT by
InterceptPoint
(Ted, you finally endorsed. About time)
To: drewh
Laura had a show way back I think on MSNBC or something. It was a good show, but it was on before noon during the week and no one watched it because of its time slot.
13 posted on
10/23/2017 10:15:51 AM PDT by
Slyfox
(Are you tired of winning yet?)
To: drewh
The Daily Beast???
You know Chelsea Clinton is on their board.
I would not waste time with the Daily Beast.
To: drewh
“Overbearing” = “pushy.” How sexist of this article-um-er-propaganda piece.
15 posted on
10/23/2017 10:16:22 AM PDT by
TTFlyer
To: drewh
Notice this hit piece makes it through three quarters of the article with unsourced attacks on Laura’s character, then finishes up with a few named proponents. Crap writing.
To: drewh
if Laura was a man, would they have written this using the word “overbearing”.
Daily Beast war on women
18 posted on
10/23/2017 10:18:35 AM PDT by
dontreadthis
(I finally came up with this tagline)
To: drewh
According to numerous sources, Ingraham has been, occasionally, a verbally abusive boss, who will not hesitate to scream at employees if something goes awry. Two former employees of her radio show recounted to The Daily Beast separate instances of Ingraham hurling objects at staff members in displeasure. According to numerous sources, Clinton has been, occasionally, a verbally abusive boss, who will not hesitate to scream at employees if something goes awry. Two former employees of her tenure in office recounted to The Daily Beast separate instances of Clinton hurling objects at staff members in displeasure.
To: drewh
As I recall, Laura was engaged during the time she discovered her breast cancer.
(2005/2006?)
In her recovery phase, the discussion of the engagement evaporated.
21 posted on
10/23/2017 10:25:02 AM PDT by
G Larry
(There is no great virtue in bargaining with the Devil)
To: drewh
I’m smelling fake news or the idiots at Faux News don’t understand how ratings work.
23 posted on
10/23/2017 10:25:54 AM PDT by
jmaroneps37
(Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
To: drewh
Reads to me like someone’s trying to gin up a game of lets-you-and-her-fight...
24 posted on
10/23/2017 10:26:18 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Was Obama surveilling John Roberts? Might explain a lot.)
To: drewh
Are they trying to turn Laura Ingraham into the next Megyn Kelly? They want to see Ingraham tank the way that Kelly is at NBC.
-PJ
27 posted on
10/23/2017 10:28:39 AM PDT by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: drewh
I guess they are afraid of strong women?
28 posted on
10/23/2017 10:28:40 AM PDT by
SubMareener
(Save us from Quarterly Freepathons! Become a MONTHLY DONOR)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson