Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: drewh

Punk wasn’t punk by 1979, let alone 1982 or 1988.

The bands these tards are citing as ‘punk’ aren’t “punk” either. Hardcore, thrash, and speed metal aren’t punk.

But the Seattle groups did have ties to ‘punk’ groups.

Meanwhile these same hacks will tell you yesterday’s Democrat politician is a ‘rock star’ ans defend why NWA, Chic, and Joan Baez are in the R&R HoF.


21 posted on 10/20/2017 2:19:15 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: a fool in paradise

I just want to say, I don’t know the differences among punk or grunge or new wave or hip hop or other such modern music.

Can we just say she went through a phase, without regard to the distinctions among grunge and punk and what not?


26 posted on 10/20/2017 2:25:35 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise

They seem to only know LA punk, which in my opinion is genuine but came later.


38 posted on 10/20/2017 3:30:44 PM PDT by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: a fool in paradise
Punk wasn’t punk by 1979

Thank you. Punk stopped being Punk soon after the mainstream rock mags began reporting on it.

By then, the post punk of Gang of Four, Shrapnel, Bad Brains, et al was flourishing on both sides of the pond. Dang, those were good years for music.

45 posted on 10/21/2017 9:25:32 AM PDT by Skooz (Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us Gabba Gabba we accept you we accept you one of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson