I know hospitals.I know physicians and surgeons.I know hospital lawyers.I know how they think...I know how they speak.While you could be correct it is,IMO,very likely that the hospital statement quoted in this piece would have been worded differently.
Bottom line...there's not nearly enough in this piece to give an accurate picture of what's going on here.The statements that I've made are based on hunches based on experience...but even my experience isn't enough to formulate a firm position of exactly what's happening in this case.
I know parolees. I know law. I know hospitals. He obviously used drugs. Its why im willing to throw down a sweet ten-er on it.
Even if he committed rape, he could still work a medical release under gaurd for the operation. Its obvious that something changed - inside his kidneys - that made the surgery team ask for three months delay for his kidneys to recover. And whatever altered/changed his kidneys violated his parole. Thats drugs of some form. Probably needle use related too.
I really have no idea why anyone finds this to be such a controversial concept.