I know parolees. I know law. I know hospitals. He obviously used drugs. Its why im willing to throw down a sweet ten-er on it.
Even if he committed rape, he could still work a medical release under gaurd for the operation. Its obvious that something changed - inside his kidneys - that made the surgery team ask for three months delay for his kidneys to recover. And whatever altered/changed his kidneys violated his parole. Thats drugs of some form. Probably needle use related too.
I really have no idea why anyone finds this to be such a controversial concept.
*Obviously*? Are you clairvoyant? Have you forgotten how to spell "possibly"? How do you know hospitals?