Skip to comments.
A single photon reveals quantum entanglement of 16 million atoms
Science codex. com ^
 | October 13, 2017
 | Université de Genève
Posted on 10/13/2017 5:37:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin
Scientists at the University of Geneva (UNIGE), Switzerland, recently reengineered their data processing, demonstrating that 16 million atoms were entangled in a one-centimetre crystal. 
... 
Although the concept of entanglement can be hard to grasp, it can be illustrated using two socks! Imagine a physicist who always wears two socks of different colours. When you spot a red sock on his right ankle, you also immediately learn something about the left sock: it is not red. There is a correlation, in other words, between the two socks. This is a reasonably prosaic and quite intuitive occurrence; but when we switch to the world of quantum physics, a new type of correlation -- infinitely stronger and more mysterious -- emerges: entanglement. Now, imagine there are two physicists in their own laboratories, with a great distance separating the two. Each scientist has a quantum particle, a photon, for example. If these two photons are in an entangled state, the physicists will see non-local quantum correlations, which conventional physics is unable to explain. They will find that the polarisation of the photons is always opposite (as with the socks in the above example), and that the photon has no intrinsic polarisation. The polarisation measured for each photon is, therefore, entirely random and fundamentally indeterminated before being measured. What we are dealing with here is an unsystematic phenomenon that occurs simultaneously in two locations that are far apart... and this is the mystery of quantum correlations!
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencecodex.com ...
TOPICS: Science
KEYWORDS: entanglement; quantum; quantumentanglement
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-26 next  last
    Thought for sure they'd say what color socks the guy on the other side of the planet wasn't wearing.
1
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:37:02 PM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
 
To: BenLurkin
    “The Force” in other words?
 
2
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:48:40 PM PDT
by 
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    The lonely lives of scientists ...
 
3
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:51:17 PM PDT
by 
Vesparado
(The American people know what they want and they deserve to get it good and hard --- HL Mencken)
 
To: BenLurkin
    In solids, everything is entangled, so don’t be impressed by all the talk ... DO be impressed by aluminum foil! It beggars the scientific imagination.
 
4
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:53:06 PM PDT
by 
dr_lew
(I)
 
To: BenLurkin
    There is a ton of problems with the usefulness, in any practical sense, of quantum states. When we are dealing, as all human-matter relationships are, at levels where humans can engineer how matter is determined and handled, we are not dealing with matter in any quantum state; not that any human tools of empirical evidence can use.
When quantum physics is so mature it is a mere part of everyday physics and humans can make everyday use of “quantum physics” then people should start taking a real interest. Until then it remains a curiosity.
 
5
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:56:54 PM PDT
by 
Wuli
 
To: 2ndDivisionVet
    Somebody here keeps the String Theory ping list....
 
6
posted on 
10/13/2017 5:57:06 PM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact.  It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
 
To: Wuli
7
posted on 
10/13/2017 6:10:36 PM PDT
by 
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
 
To: Paladin2
To: Wuli
    Well, quantum tunnel microscopes have been around over thirty years.
Quantum hall effect has been used in resistance calibration for over twenty years.
I’d say it’s more than a curiosity.
 
9
posted on 
10/13/2017 6:30:34 PM PDT
by 
sparklite2
(I'm less interested in the rights I have than the liberties I can take.)
 
To: BenLurkin
    How does one really prove what is happening when not measured?
 
10
posted on 
10/13/2017 6:46:45 PM PDT
by 
YogicCowboy
("I am not entirely on anyone's side, because no one is entirely on mine." - JRRT)
 
To: BenLurkin
    Well then. In some dimension or state, the two photons are not "far apart." They might even be the same thing.
To: BenLurkin
    I think they make all this shit up to get money.
 
12
posted on 
10/13/2017 6:53:48 PM PDT
by 
bigtoona
(Make America Great Again! America First!)
 
To: Buttons12
    Near as I can tell, that’s the explanation.
But don’t know.
 
13
posted on 
10/13/2017 6:54:34 PM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact.  It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
 
To: bigtoona
    >>I think they make all this shit up to get money.<<
Now that observation is not only funny, it may also be TRUE!
 
To: BenLurkin
    Let’s say the “photon socks” are red and blue.
If you change the red one to where the blue one is, its red partner immediately changes correspondingly — simultaneously, without apparent communication, and at distances so great that relatively, the signals would need to travel faster than the speed of light, if indeed there were signals at all. And according to all conventional scientific understanding, this is not possible. Yet it occurs, repeatedly.
This is entanglement. It points to some unitary consciousness, some unitary force, behind the entanglements.
That force, that consciousness, can be said to be God.
 
15
posted on 
10/13/2017 7:24:15 PM PDT
by 
TBP
 
To: Dalberg-Acton
16
posted on 
10/13/2017 7:29:39 PM PDT
by 
xp38
 
To: bigtoona
    There is speculation, wild speculation, and then there is cosmology. And now this.
 
To: 2ndDivisionVet
    Something very much like it.
 
18
posted on 
10/13/2017 7:45:28 PM PDT
by 
TBP
 
To: Paladin2
    C’mon, man, the whole digital empire is built on EXQUISITE Quantum Engineering. Look it up. It’s just so commonplace we don’t respect it anymore. Lord Almighty!
 
19
posted on 
10/13/2017 7:49:56 PM PDT
by 
dr_lew
(I)
 
To: Buttons12
    In some dimension or state, the two photons are not "far apart." They might even be the same thing. 
 
 You might be on to something. 
 
 I've always thought that particle entanglement is nothing more than a connection. That connection is nothing more than the very definition of "gravity". "Everything" is connected to itself. A photon at the edge of the universe might be connected to itself, which is manifesting itself as locally situated, but "entangled" or connected to itself. 
 
 If that were to be true, and everything in the universe is nothing more than a single particle with infinite entanglements. The whole universe might be just one "tiniest" of particles, which can take on unending property varieties. 
 
 So, entanglement is the same as gravity, where every instance of the entangled particle is always pulling back on itself. Entanglements mean that, the "single particle" can manifest itself throughout the infinite space, throughout infinite time. That "singularity" or single particle, can move in time and in space, all at the same time. 
 
 That singularity is what gave birth to the universe. That particle moved in time, and in space, both forwards and backwards. Everything we see in the universe is just one singularity, expressing itself as a multitude of "different things". All stars and planets and all the stuff that makes up the universe, are all "created" from that one single particle. Heck, all humans and all life-forms are made up from the same "entangler" or same creation particle. 
 
 Since our creation particle moves in time and in space, we should be seeing instances of past events, in current time. Likewise with "future" events. Okay, I'm getting a headache.... but.... that's my theory and I'm sticking with it.
20
posted on 
10/13/2017 8:05:12 PM PDT
by 
adorno
(w)
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-26 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson