Skip to comments.
Lindsay Lohan Defends Weinstein From Sexual Assault Allegations
Daily Caller ^
| 10/11/17
| Gabrielle Okun
Posted on 10/11/2017 9:39:26 AM PDT by markomalley
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
To: arthurus
I think that philosophically (not legally, before someone has a cow ...), a person can be sexually harassed, and it is still harassment even if the person puts up with it. One of the points of harassment, after all, is to wear down the target so that he or she will “willingly” “consent” to something that’s not wanted.
In a different context, some of my teenagers are excellent at this. They hassle me until I “willingly” do what they want, even though I don’t want to and don’t think it’s the right idea. It leaves me feeling angry both with them and with myself.
21
posted on
10/11/2017 10:02:33 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
(Truth.)
To: LostPassword
I think that is a sensible approach...
22
posted on
10/11/2017 10:02:50 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
To: rlmorel
Well, if Weinstein never did anything at all to Lohan, and she never heard a thing about any of this until this week, she may be afraid he’s going to commit suicide. HW’s about to pay dearly â as well he should â for any bad things he’s done â but people who have called him their friend, and have benefited from his friendship, have a moral obligation to stand by him. Also, I am curious from a legal perspective whether women such as Rose McGowan could be in hot water for speaking out after having taken money from Weinstein. Usually pay-offs are in exchange for confidentiality.
23
posted on
10/11/2017 10:08:22 AM PDT
by
utahagen
(but but)
To: Darksheare
>>>claiming that Weinstein never harassed her<<<
Of course not, Lindsay. Harvey ‘did’ have some standards . . .
24
posted on
10/11/2017 10:08:43 AM PDT
by
Pilgrim's Progress
(http://www.baptistbiblebelievers.com/BYTOPICS/tabid/335/Default.aspx D)
To: Bullish
“Harveys a coke-head...”
Chubbiest cokehead since John Belushi!
25
posted on
10/11/2017 10:09:17 AM PDT
by
utahagen
(but but)
To: markomalley
Why is she talking with an accent??
To: markomalley
From her bathroom in Dubai, United Arab Emirates... WTH???
27
posted on
10/11/2017 10:11:56 AM PDT
by
ex91B10
To: dfwgator
Even Harvey has some level of Hygiene minimums.
28
posted on
10/11/2017 10:12:03 AM PDT
by
KC Burke
(If all the world is a stage, I would like to request my lighting be adjusted.)
To: markomalley
"claiming that Weinstein never harassed her"No one said he didn't have any standards.
29
posted on
10/11/2017 10:13:55 AM PDT
by
norwaypinesavage
(The stone age didn't end because we ran out of stones.)
To: utahagen
"...but people who have called him their friend, and have benefited from his friendship, have a moral obligation to stand by him..." I agree with most of what you have said, but I disagree with this. I think the decision to stand by someone is highly dependent on circumstances, though if I were his friend and I didn't know about this stuff (very dubious, seems like everyone knew) I would stand by him until there was proof, and at the least, wouldn't throw him under the bus.
30
posted on
10/11/2017 10:14:49 AM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
To: rlmorel
There are different ways of standing by a friend. Jesus said we should visit people in prison, so I don't think deserting friends is ever an option. I am skeptical about the “rape” charges and would be inclined to believe Harvey Weinstein that he at least believed his sexual contact was consensual. However, what has been described was immoral, boorish, adulterous, unethical. If I were his friend, I would tell him to take his lumps. I wouldn't denounce him publicly, which I find to be grandstanding. I would NOT have encouraged him to try to save his job. He has years of work ahead of him in the form of repairing his relationships with his children and his brother. he should try to save his marriage. Also, he is Jewish and probably has given generously to Jewish causes. It's time to start practicing Judaism. Of course, he should make financial and personal amends to any women he did embarrass or harass.
I know people who know Harvey Weinstein. He has been personally helpful and generous to many people — and I am not snarkily alluding to sexual tit-for-tat. Those people owe him loyalty, even - perhaps, especially — at a time like this.
31
posted on
10/11/2017 10:21:52 AM PDT
by
utahagen
(but but)
To: utahagen
32
posted on
10/11/2017 10:25:11 AM PDT
by
karnage
To: Darksheare
My thought as well. If not consenting behavior, it was requested by her and was highly-desired behavior!
33
posted on
10/11/2017 10:35:09 AM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I can only donate monthly, but socialists' ABBCNNBCBS continue to lie every day!)
To: dfwgator
"That's not who we are as Harvey Weinstains" Barack Obama - who incidentally gave his eldest "daughter" up to the Weinstain Co. as an "unpaid" intern
34
posted on
10/11/2017 10:59:01 AM PDT
by
atc23
(The Confederacy was the single greatest conservative resistance to federal authority ever)
To: ex91B10
I’m guessing she’s playing party girl for some Royal.
35
posted on
10/11/2017 11:06:31 AM PDT
by
Wolfie
To: markomalley
So, she was one of the ones who went along willingly to assure her career advancement (then screwed herself up and blew it anyway)?
36
posted on
10/11/2017 11:18:47 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: Tax-chick
In a different context, some of my teenagers are excellent at this. They hassle me until I willingly do what they want, even though I dont want to and dont think its the right idea. It leaves me feeling angry both with them and with myself.
Me too! The go away and shut up argument! Ugh!
37
posted on
10/11/2017 11:21:54 AM PDT
by
Yaelle
To: LydiaLong
Hitler never killed any Jews that I knew.Had Hitler lived to be tried, he would have said "I neffer killed anyvun...I vas only giffing orders!"
38
posted on
10/11/2017 11:22:17 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: utahagen
...would be inclined to believe Harvey Weinstein that he at least believed his sexual contact was consensual.If you contract with a prostitute for a rape-fantasy, how can you tell when the NO really means no? If you are use sexual favors as a job requirement, how can you tell when the YES doesn't mean yes?
39
posted on
10/11/2017 11:30:59 AM PDT
by
JimRed
( TERM LIMITS, NOW! Build the Wall Faster! TRUTH is the new HATE SPEECH.)
To: utahagen
I don’t think we completely disagree on this...I think it boils down to what we mean by “stand by a friend”, IOW, defining the terms.
We could probably agree it doesn’t mean blindly supporting someone while condemning the accusers.
40
posted on
10/11/2017 12:19:23 PM PDT
by
rlmorel
(Liberals: American Liberty is the egg that requires breaking to make their Utopian omelette.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-58 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson