I’d say the person posing rhetorical questions couched in ignorance/stupidity for the purposes of propaganda. Not just dumb, but maliciously so.
It’s also couched in a lot of self-congratulatory snark and sarcasm, which don’t speak well for the author.
The motive still doesn’t make sense and there is reason to suspect that there was more to this guy than meets the eye and there are many conflicting stories. The media has stopped asking questions and moved on to Harvey Weinstein so I don’t mind if others continue to question the official narrative. I don’t think it’s dumb or malicious. It’s just part of any dialectic.