The killer visited the Middle East. His girlfriend visited the Middle East. He wired $100,000 to his girlfriend in the Phillipines only days before the massacre. He had many major financial transactions that are now under investigation for covert terrorism financing.
So which is is? Did a millionaire who gambled $10,000 per day and took dozens of cruises per year need funding for the attack, or was he funding other terrorist activities?
Can't have it both ways.
Why not have it both ways?
What if Paddock did finance terrorist groups and found out he had a terminal disease. His final act for the jihad?