Replies

Anyone know their actual track record? Seems the Accuweather daily forecasts have not been at all dependable.

25 posted on 10/04/2017 9:59:18 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (Freeper formerly known as bushwon ;))

Here’s a source that’s less dramatic and probably more honest:

http://www.radioiowa.com/2017/09/26/climate-prediction-center-issues-a-la-nina-watch/

...“A number of the models vary from just marginal La Nina conditions to moderately strong ones,” Todey says. “There’s not a good consensus as to how strong this one will be, therefore, we’re kind of waffling on what the outlook is going to mean to us.”...

...“No where does CPC put in a below-average chance for temperature but they are saying mostly equal chances for below or above average,” Todey says.

“You’re balancing this trend toward warmer winters with the La Nina conditions which have a little better probability of being cooler.”

Todey says a La Nina system could also lead to more snow over the Midwest and Northern Plains this winter...

31 posted on 10/05/2017 3:23:29 AM PDT by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")

Seems the Accuweather daily forecasts have not been at all dependable.

Which is why I call it InAccuweather....

32 posted on 10/05/2017 3:23:30 AM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))

"Seems the Accuweather daily forecasts have not been at all dependable."

At least they aren't naming every snowflake that falls.

36 posted on 10/05/2017 7:41:32 AM PDT by outofsalt ( If history teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794