[Enlightened1]

This is a 38 second video.

That compares the sounds. What do you think?

[usconservative]

The rate of fire and waveforms match almost exactly. If you have ever used a bump fire you know they are finnicky at best and certainly not capable of firing a perfect 74 round burst as shown in this video.

I've argued a bump stock cannot possibly result in 100 rounds of ammo being fired at the exact same intervals between rounds as was heard in numerous recordings of the gunfire in Las Vegas, yet some Freepers WHO'VE NEVER FIRED A RIFLE WITH A BUMP STOCK insist it's possible.

I've fired rifle's with bump stock's. Firing at perfect cadence is NOT POSSIBLE.

It was most definitely a fully automatic weapon (or weapons) used.

The whole bump stock argument is going to be used by the Federal Government to BAN them and so many here on FR are falling for it.

It's pathetic.

[LegendHasIt]

Well, I’ll admit that the first few times I heard the videos that everyone was playing Monday, I thought “Dang, that sure sounds like an M-60!!!”.

Even teased myself that I could hear the links and brass falling on concrete below (which of course is pretty dang unlikely from ~500 yards away, what with all the other noises going on).

But it probably wasn’t what it sounded like to me.

(ex Army Ranger)

[VeniVidiVici]

The part that bothered me of the bump fire excuse was that I’VE never been able to bump fire with such quality as on the video I’ve heard in LV.

Sure sounded like auto fire to me.

[Daffynition]

Are the antis suing the manufacturers of bump-stocks yet?

[Gene Eric]

The weapon had a variable rate of fire (as recorded by someone at the foundation of Mandalay Bay.)