Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JP1201

This article has to be completely disregarded because of the inclusion the strobe light issue. It’s been completely and totally debunked over and over yet included. How can you take anything else in the article seriously if the author is not smart enough to see the truth... it was a strobe light.


3 posted on 10/04/2017 9:03:58 AM PDT by TruBluKentuckian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TruBluKentuckian
The possible "second shooter" is the one big item from the on-the-scene reports and evidence that I've seen. I know the alleged muzzle flashes from the fourth floor have been debunked (what you see in those videos is almost certainly a flashing strobe light -- probably from the fire alarm system inside the building), but one of those videos (from the woman in the car) contains very strong evidence of gunfire coming from two different locations ... one close to the car, and the other much further away.

I would not be surprised if there were first responders on the ground or a lower level rooftop of the hotel who were returning fire against the perp on the 32nd floor.

31 posted on 10/04/2017 9:23:45 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Tell them to stand!" -- President Trump, 9/23/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TruBluKentuckian

The easiest explanation to support the strobe reflection is where are the holes in the windows that the tin-foil crowd keeps trying to propogate. The windows are fixed in place structural panels from floor to ceiling and weighing about 700 pounds with the frame structure it is sealed to. Only removable from the outside because of the way it is sealed to the frame.


70 posted on 10/04/2017 10:40:56 AM PDT by mazda77
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson