Posted on 09/12/2017 4:01:48 PM PDT by heterosupremacist
Michael Flynn, former chief of staff for President Donald Trump and ex-U.S. intelligence chief, revealed in 2016 that laptops seized from jihadists were filled with as much as 80 percent pornography, alongside videos of beheadings and other gruesome footage.
CIA Director Mike Pompeo said that the “documents retrieved from the 2011 Navy Seal raid that killed Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden would be released in ‘weeks’—with the exception of one particular part of the haul, his pornography stash.”
The Newsweek article below indicates that “while these documents are considered operational, his porn collection is not, and will likely remain classified.” Whatever that means. There is an aspect of jihadi depravity that should be publicly disclosed, considering that jihadis routinely victimize women. The Daily Mail reported that according to doctors in Syria: “ISIS fighters are desperately trying to obtain Viagra, spending money on kinky underwear for their ‘wives’… then subjecting them to ‘brutal, abnormal’ sex acts.” The article also pointed out that the same is done for “the hundreds of young women and children they kidnapped and now keep or sell as sex slaves.”
So how is this information considered not “operational” or unimportant about “holy” head of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden?
Not only did jihadists use porn for pleasure, they also embedded secret coded messages into shared pornography and onto pedophile Web sites….In 2011-2012, German police found more than 100 al Qaeda documents concerning terrorist plots embedded within a porn video hidden in suspect’s Maqsood Lodin’s underwear.
(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...
Probably just pictures of goats anyway.
>>So how is this information considered not “operational” or unimportant about “holy” head of al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden?
Obama gave Osama a respectful Islamic funeral ceremony paid for by US taxpayers.
Let that sink in.
Can’t “spike the football”. Except “we” can use Obama GOT Osama as a campaign slogan.
We don’t need the actual movies, just release a manifest of the ‘Metadata’. Remember? That harmless data the government collects on everyone - filenames?
muslime kiddie porn... 
There ewe go again!
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/892823/posts
Commentary: On Internet Rumors that Saddam Starred in Gay Porn Films
NewsPundit.net ^ | 4/14/2003 | Douglas Oliver
Maybe Obama took all of Osama’s gay porn for himself.
>>I agree release it or the general details.
They won’t. It’s not like he’s being questioned for the Supreme Court or anything.
The Pentagon wants to divvy it up ‘mongst themselves.
Just as plausible. Maybe even more.
Because Bill Clinton’s reading it?
White women starring no doubt.
At least Cruz doesn’t get aroused to dead babies like his adversaries.
What kind of porn do you look at?
To jihadis, the beheadings are also porno.
Saw hadji porn, panicked, skated.
We don’t call them The Most Sexually Maladjusted People on the Planet for nothing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.