The UN is still at war with North Korea. The situation has existed since the 1953 truce that ended the fighting
America has no dealings with the truce other than officially through the UN. I think that the UN and the Norks still hold talk s at Panmunjom
(I’m pretty sure)
The U.N. isn’t at war with anyone. It doesn’t have any citizens with which to wage war.
Members of nations around the world may be, but the U.N. is a vapor trail.
It declares itself “the body” to negotiate these things, but look at it’s success rates.
I has a very lousy track record.
With North Korea alone, it has allowed a declared war to exist since 1953. A truce is not a formal agreement that war no longer exists.
The U.N. likes to claim it keeps the peace. It has prominent peacekeeping rolls in the Middle-East. Let’s look at one of them.
In Southern Lebanon, Hezbollah has armed it region to the teeth. This was done under the watch of the U.N. All the U. N. did was give Hezbollah cover.
Israel was kept from entering the area to prevent the arming on it’s border, while the U. N. looked the other way while Hezbollah brought in massive stockpiles of weapons and armaments.
The U. N.’s peacekeeping forces are as well known for raping children as feeding them.
Further, who is actually feeding people around the world? the U.N.?
No, the United States and other nations provide food, water, vaccines, and funding for all these programs. The U.N. provides NOTHING ON ITS OWN. NOTHING!
I submit the world would be a lot better off, if the U.N. underwriting were done away with, and nations round the planet converted their membership fees to direct food, water, vaccines, and housing provision.
The U.N. burns hundreds of billions of not more, paying it’s staff, keeping it’s entities open, and trashing sovereign nations with a ferve targeted as some of the worst nations on planet earth.
A Libyan in charge of their global terrorism commiteed, pre the exit of Qaddafi? Really? Yes.
It needs to be ended.