Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Actress refuses abortion: ‘He was my son and he needed me’
Lifesite News ^ | 8/24/2017 | Staff

Posted on 09/05/2017 8:24:14 AM PDT by simpson96

August 24, 2017 (SPUC) — All too often, parents are pressured by doctors to undergo genetic screening, and even to abort their babies if it is thought they have a disability. Now a video where an actress hilariously relates how she resisted this pressure is going viral.

When actress Lynn Fergusson (most famous for voicing Mac in Chicken Run) became pregnant with her first child at the age of 37, she was surprised to find that her pregnancy was labeled "geriatric." However, she was even more surprised by the relentless pressure doctors put on her first to undergo an amniocentesis, and then to abort her baby. Her talk, published by storytelling website The Moth, is related with humor, and is a beautiful example of a mother determined to do the best for her son.

The pressure begins

From the beginning, Fergusson was determined not to have the amniocentesis, which carries a 1 percent risk of miscarriage. "It’s not technically the baby’s fault that I’m old, you know," she said. "So I’m not gonna take a risk. Not unless there’s a good reason."(snip)

But the doctors continued to push, first because they suspected Down's syndrome, and then, terrifyingly, Edwards' syndrome, a condition where most babies die in the womb, or shortly after birth. Her response was amazing:

"You know, we had so many scans," said Ferguson. "I had seen my son. I’d seen his heart. I’d seen the inside of his eyes. (snip) He was my son and he needed me. He depended on me to make the right decision. So I said, ‘No.'"


(Excerpt) Read more at lifesitenews.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: prolife; right2life
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

1 posted on 09/05/2017 8:24:14 AM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

She looks 47, but God Bless her.


2 posted on 09/05/2017 8:29:18 AM PDT by subterfuge (Save the monuments!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

And she gave birth to a healthy baby boy.


3 posted on 09/05/2017 8:29:29 AM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Yup. Too bad her ob didn’t accept the first no and then do only the scans (two) needed to help with delivery decisions

Glad she was a mom from the get go


4 posted on 09/05/2017 8:30:37 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96; Mrs. Don-o

My mother was 37 when I was born...


5 posted on 09/05/2017 8:31:02 AM PDT by Tennessee Nana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
My mother had ten children. Her last one was born when she was 43. Her doctor badgered her throughout her pregnancy that her chances of having a Down Syndrome baby was very high because of her age. The doctor, we found out later, was the head of Planned Parenthood in the county where we lived. He had taken over the her previous doctor's practice because he had died. And he was embarrassed that one of his patients was refusing to get an abortion.

My mother gave birth to a healthy, normal red-headed baby girl. Now, she would have accepted the baby even if she was Down Syndrome. But, that poor excuse for a doctor made her life hell for 9 months.

6 posted on 09/05/2017 8:35:57 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

"...She looks 47..."


She was born in April 1965, so if you guess her age as 47 y.o., she will be appreciative.

7 posted on 09/05/2017 8:44:21 AM PDT by Blue Jays ( Rock hard ~ Ride free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

I was 40 when I had our last son. Kaiser pressured me too, to have the omnio and labeled me “at risk”. I refused on the grounds of my “religion”, which they reluctantly accepted. Yes, we too had a beautiful healthy 9.5 lb baby boy without any blemish. Thank you Jesus.


8 posted on 09/05/2017 8:46:52 AM PDT by georgiegirl (Count me covfefe in the Deplorable Basket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: georgiegirl

I once asked a doctor about the amnio test and that it sounded to me like “search and destroy” and he said “No, it is search and prepare.” And I said “Prepare to destroy?” He didn’t like that response.


9 posted on 09/05/2017 8:53:05 AM PDT by Slyfox (Are you tired of winning yet?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge

She’s 52 now, she was 37 when they called her pregnancy geriatric.


10 posted on 09/05/2017 8:53:32 AM PDT by a fool in paradise (Did Barack Obama denounce Communism and dictatorships when he visited Cuba as a puppet of the State?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

I like her haircut: it’s a lot like mine! I was 45 when my youngest child was born.


11 posted on 09/05/2017 9:00:43 AM PDT by Tax-chick ("Freedom is freedom, and not another thing."~Theodore Dalrymple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

“search and destroy” is exactly right. The little Kaiser nurse that was offering the amnio test to me later told me a sad story. She said she too was pregnant a while back, had an amnio, and was told there was something wrong with her baby. At six months, she worried so much about the baby, she had a miscarriage. The baby was perfectly fine afterall. She quietly said to me, I’m glad you refused the test. The test destroyed her perfectly healthy pregnancy, and any joy in anticipating the arrival of her baby.


12 posted on 09/05/2017 9:07:20 AM PDT by georgiegirl (Count me covfefe in the Deplorable Basket)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

In 1988 I was 35 and refused amnio and I don’t think they had a blood test at that time for diseases like Down Syndrome...which wouldn’t have made a difference.

As to the amnio I told my doctor that no matter what amnio showed I wasn’t going to abort. So because I refused the test, I had to sign a document, have it
notarized, the whole bit, stating that I was refusing the test and if the baby was
born with a problem that could have been picked up by the amnio, then we would not sue for “wrongful birth.” That was almost 30 years ago. Now with all the specific testing, I’m sure the pressure to have the tests is so much stronger.


13 posted on 09/05/2017 9:31:47 AM PDT by Dawn53Fl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Thank you for sharing this.


14 posted on 09/05/2017 9:51:17 AM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Yes, all you women love those short haired MEN’s haircuts and tell each other “Oh its SO CUTE!”

It’s not.


15 posted on 09/05/2017 9:51:38 AM PDT by Mr. K (***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

That was rude.


16 posted on 09/05/2017 9:54:14 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: georgiegirl

Heartbreaking story.


17 posted on 09/05/2017 9:55:11 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dawn53Fl

I have a 7 mos old child. The pressure to take the test was there, but mild pressure. We were reassured there was no need to extract amniotic fluid like the old days. I asked my wife if she would want and love her baby regardless. It was insulting to ask her, but I did for the Doctor’s sake. Then I told the doctor no to the test. We were asked 1 or 2 more times by the doctor. And again when an advanced ultrasound was done by the doctor doing that. We told the 2nd doctor the same thing as the first and that was that. All told the pressure was very mild. There was no disclosure to sign. And like the woman in this article, my wife was considered old, at the age of 38.


18 posted on 09/05/2017 9:56:36 AM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

It’s a very becoming haircut on certain women, and those it suits usually can’t wear longer styles as well as they can the pixie.


19 posted on 09/05/2017 9:59:32 AM PDT by FrdmLvr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

Once in awhile I’ll be around a woman who has just cut her hair short and other women tell her it’s “so cute”. It’s self serving is it not to encourage other women to reduce their beauty to men? I am curious if most of the women who cut their hair short do it with or without prior knowledge and approval of their husbands.


20 posted on 09/05/2017 10:00:51 AM PDT by BJ1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson