Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgana

Possibly a line of reasoning on the thought process of the “LEO’s” involved. The victim is a CDL holder and D.O.T. regulations state that any time a C.D.L. holder is involved in an accident that results in a fatality, regardless of fault, they must submit to a drug test. My understanding of this situation, the laws regarding blood draws would take precedence.


84 posted on 09/02/2017 8:52:03 PM PDT by Spacetrucker (George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to defeat the British - HE SHOT THEM .. WITH GUNS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Spacetrucker

BS. The injured driver at the hospital would still have to consent and he was unable to do so.


86 posted on 09/02/2017 9:20:45 PM PDT by Ken H (Best election ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: Spacetrucker

Not in the case of a patient in a burn unit who has already been administered a regimen of drugs to keep him alive.


97 posted on 09/02/2017 9:56:23 PM PDT by MrEdd (Caveat Emptor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

To: Spacetrucker

In those situations involving a cdl driver and a fatal crash the post crash drug and alcohol are breath and urine tests (not a blood test) , obtained by the driver’s employer, with a 32 hour window for the drug test.

Law enforcement would only get involved in getting a blood test if there was probable cause.


107 posted on 09/02/2017 10:48:31 PM PDT by Newtoidaho (Proud member of Trump's army of online trol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson