Fox was quoting the Weekly Standard. A well known never Trump publication. All of this is flake news. Plenty of stories out about what Bannon is really going to do.
Drama queen.
Do we really know what kind of role bannon played and what he did?
The way I see it is if Trump starts going soft than Bannon was important, if not then not a big deal.
If the news actually reported the news, instead of reporting what other reporters are reporting maybe we’d get some REAL news.
Exposing the media for the jerks they are. Sit back, have a coke. Things will become clearer in a few days.
Yawn
She backed Romney over the field in 2012, so she’s in no position to get all principled over the situation. Trump has all the Democrats and the worst Republicans hard against him. No time for egos, and lots of unseen mo involved parts. If we don’t back Trump now, then it will be clear that we can be manipulated routinely on overarching issues.
Bringing in Kelly pretty much announced that the American-American change is over. Ivanka is a NY liberal.
Don’t believe these Lying Leftist Media outlets like the Daily Beast and its leader Eleanor Clift, that proved themselves during the 2016 campaign to be operatives of the DNC and intentional liars. They are presumed to be lying and we should presume what they publish is a lie. The presumption can only be rebutted with the outlet providing clear and convincing evidence they are not lying.
We should be mostly publishing the truth on FR, not the lies, and as much good news as possible to bolster morale. We should find and post reliable sources that have already deconstructed the lie and replaced it with the truth and with a headline that says the truth. We need much more of that on FR IMO. The key is the headline and the first few sentences because not everyone has time to drill down. The endless stream of negative, lying headlines sabotages our purpose IMO.
Steve Bannon just went on the record with me about his next move (story breaking now on @TheTerminal and @bw): pic.twitter.com/EDPULg25VR— Joshua Green (@JoshuaGreen) August 18, 2017
No it was Willard who was Ann Coulter’s “emperor god”
What a drama king.
He added that the Presidency as we know it is over, that it would become less populist.
Look, we love her when she’s good and hate her when she supports the eGOP. It’s just the flaky, fair weather friend that she is.
My suspicion is that the two greatest troll masters ever are having one more big laugh at our gullibility. Why just quit a job you’ve tired of when you can send the press into a frenzy by releasing one final cage of rabbits for everyone to chase?
Only Trump and Bannon and a very few other senior people know what is really going on. All that the talking heads are doing is inventing stories in order to sound important and advance an agenda.
Ann thought Mittens Rombot was God’s gift and dated Bill “The Schnozz” Maher, so her judgment isn’t the best on a lot of things. When she’s on a roll she’s good.
Shut yer holster Ann.
Oh, well. I would have warned her, if she’d called me. Idols always disappoint. Honestly, I couldn’t believe she believed she’d see the outcomes she wants. Shows how we deceive ourselves.
On the other hand, if one’s reasoning was, “A fried egg on toast is better than Hillary Clinton,” then one can face each day’s events with a shrug, observing, “Yep, still better than Hillary Clinton.”