“Science has embraced the uncertainty of quantum physics and that has found itself allied with Buddhism.”
Interesting observation. I wonder about the logic that leads to that conclusion.
I wonder why you wonder...
>>I wonder about the logic that leads to that conclusion.<<
I think that makes you a Buddhist also. Or a Heisenbergist?
Are you kidding me?
I’m just an objective observer and I’m not inclined to justify the illogical state of affairs.
It’s just what I see happening.
You can read or watch any number of these seemingly intelligent and educated thought leaders of today or dig deep into the works of philosophers that have addressed all of this before.
You may want to start with Joseph Campbell. Hands down he was the most preeminent authority on Mythology/Religion for those seeking an alternative to Christianity. A Buddhist that led me to Christ.
Dr. Fred Alan Wolf is another well published nut job, but very influential.
You could also read/watch Prof. William Provine (Cornell University) and his rantings on Natural Law and his rejection of free will.
There are soo many more.
Richard Dawkins, (he may be coming around)
Sam Harris
Christopher Hitchens (RIP)
Lawrence Krauss
Daniel Dennett
Etc..
On the right side of the debate for truth;
William Lane Craig
John Lennox
Phillip E. Johnson
David Berlinski, one of my personal favorites.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31MI5c7LYSU
__________________________________________________________
My conclusion.
The co-opted Science of the left is more about feelings than facts.
They are trying to convince us that feelings are facts.
It may seen a bit abstract, however, when/if you consider the desperate nature of those that are doing everything they can to reject objective truth in order to feel accepted and avoid having to have any foundation for their beliefs, it seems natural for them to “Embrace Uncertainty”.