Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: IndispensableDestiny
> NT 4 and I think Win 2K had “Unix subsystem for Windows.” They needed it for POSIX compliance.

Yeah, that's right. The Windows Services for Unix was whipped up back around 2000 so they could claim POSIX. But Microsoft never treated it seriously, it was never very useful, and they nearly deprecated it from time to time.

This time they're running scared and they know that to survive they have to attract Linux users and developers, which is a very different, and much more powerful, motivation.

9 posted on 08/09/2017 10:14:29 AM PDT by dayglored ("Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: dayglored
This time they're running scared and they know that to survive they have to attract Linux users and developers, which is a very different, and much more powerful, motivation.

Considering the overwhelming majority of mainstream business software runs on Windows PC's and Windows Server environments, I'm not so sure Microsoft is running scared.

What they ARE doing is giving developers a choice in the environment they want to develop without consideration to the underlying OS. Personally I think it's a good thing. It's going to expand capabilities beyond the individual OS platforms themselves.

15 posted on 08/10/2017 7:08:33 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson