Posted on 07/29/2017 9:33:39 PM PDT by Beave Meister
G. Gordon Liddy’s son.
likely a set up - he must of pissed off the wrong people
Sad. G. Gordon is a good Catholic. His wife was a saintly woman.
http://www.legacy.com/obituaries/washingtonpost/obituary.aspx?pid=139436654
He’s lucky the Navy SEAL’s didn’t get to him first, that’s where they train...
“likely a set up.”
How do you set a person up to distribute child porn?
Down boy, remember 3 things:
(1) He has yet to be convicted of anything.
(2) He's a Republican in the putrid Democrat morass known as California.
(3) He is the son of G Gordon Liddy, a man Liberals hate only a little less than President Trump.
I don't know if he's guilty or not, but I do know I am very uncomfortable with the scene surrounding him. We will see.
It does not appear that the accused is denying the allegation.
I may be just imagining things, but it seems like I remember something about when Obama’s new Dept. of Defense (read ‘social changes/paradigm shift’) was being pushed through, many military leaders who wasn’t on board were found with child porn and forced to resign? Not to mention being pretty easy for a hacker (or other very knowledgeable entity) to get into someone’s computer. Granted this guy could be as guilty as sin. But just strange wonderings in this sleepy mind of mine tonight.
“Not to mention being pretty easy for a hacker (or other very knowledgeable entity) to get into someones computer.”
Do you believe that a hacker entered Liddy’s brain causing him to admit to these accusations?
“It does not appear that the accused is denying the allegation.”
He is admitting to having pornography, but denying the criminal child porn charge.
Threats of false accusation with manufactured evidence would neatly explain why so many roaring lion GOP election winners turn into sheep as office holders.
“He is admitting to having pornography, but denying the criminal child porn charge.”
No.
Most were adults.
Some may have been children.
“He reportedly admitted to distributing the pornography but claimed that most of the images were of adults, while some may have been of children.”
It is not that I believe he was setup, etc. I am just saying the possibility exists. It is noteworthy to observe any other things going on this guys life, political, business, shady dealings too. And also any other allegations he may have had against him. Lots of items to be aware of. But like I said too, he could certainly be very guilty. I am just trying to consider all possibilities.
I really son’t understand these people. Willing women are a dime a dozen. But they don’t want women.
Weird.
You would think G Gordon’s son would be smarter than to be mixed up in such a thing.
Poor G Gordon :-( He certainly does not need this $hit messing up his golden years.
Could be some kind of a set up, unless he has admitted to this.
By saying “some” “may” have been children, he establishes his position that he does not know - therefore he did not “knowingly” exchange underage pictures.
What people seem not to know is that there is a federal law that requires hosting providers to scan images and provide reports of child pornography to the NCMEC.
Pffffft
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.