To: Garth Tater
The Baggersmag article put your tired excuse to bed mister college graduate and great engine designer, lol. You learn something new everyday. I expected a thank you, lol. Of course, there’s some never admit they are wrong. Typical misdirection, change the subject, or try to imply someone said things they didn’t. Read the article Dude, haha. You clearly don’t know torque from a ham sandwich.
39 posted on
07/18/2017 10:50:29 PM PDT by
OftheOhio
(never could dance but always could kata - Romeo company)
To: OftheOhio
I've seen the results at the track dude. 50 hp is a motorized bicycle. Or are you riding the 883 with 46 hp? Sure, you can get the front wheel off the ground in first gear if you put enough teeth on the rear sprocket - but then you top out at 102 mph /* snicker */ That ain't even close to a fast ride. But you think half of the "experts" on this thread couldn't handle your ride. Buddy, you have delusions of grandeur.
And coming from a "engineer" (note the quotes) that thinks the actual equation relating horsepower to torque is just a bunch of hooey I don't think you have much credibility. I hope you take math and physics a little more seriously in your jet engine work. LOL
Harley riders on their speed machines! Seriously, you never see them after the first turn.
41 posted on
07/18/2017 11:09:11 PM PDT by
Garth Tater
(What's mine is mine.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson