1 posted on
07/15/2017 5:15:53 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Nope, NYT knows once they print it that is all people remember.
2 posted on
07/15/2017 5:18:58 PM PDT by
dforest
To: Olog-hai
Does she have a daughter I can marry quickly? LOL
3 posted on
07/15/2017 5:19:25 PM PDT by
2ndDivisionVet
(You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: Olog-hai; onyx; Abbeville Conservative; abigailsmybaby; afnamvet; alley cat; antceecee; ...
Ping to Sarah's Amazing List.
Of Course they did, you were expecting something else?
4 posted on
07/15/2017 5:19:49 PM PDT by
KC_Lion
(If you want on First Lady Melania's, Ivanka Trump's or Sarah Palin's Ping Lists, just let me know.)
To: Olog-hai
Was the retraction above the fold?
5 posted on
07/15/2017 5:22:29 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(No spelchk nor wrong word auto substition on mobile dev. Please be intelligent and deal with it....)
To: Olog-hai
6 posted on
07/15/2017 5:22:39 PM PDT by
Chode
(You have all of the resources you are going to have. Abandon your illusions and plan accordingly.)
To: Olog-hai
Anybody know how “prompt” a correction it was?
Was it after she filed a lawsuit?
7 posted on
07/15/2017 5:23:24 PM PDT by
Popman
To: Olog-hai
This slur came YEARS after that other shooting, the Slimes was doing character assassination and they knew it.
8 posted on
07/15/2017 5:30:52 PM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Bill Clinton and Al Gore took illegal campaign contributions from the Chi-Coms and 'nobody' cared...)
To: Olog-hai
Considering that the editors and ownership of the NYT, like everyone else, knew years ago what led the shooter to his actions, it could be nothing other than malicious intent to harm behind their printing the story.
9 posted on
07/15/2017 5:31:01 PM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Olog-hai
You can retract your words but the damage was done. If you want to avoid future lawsuits, you watch your words.
If I flipped off a police officer and later said to the judge that, “I didn’t mean it,” the damage was done. I would get the punishment.
10 posted on
07/15/2017 5:32:36 PM PDT by
jonrick46
(The Left has a mental illness: A totalitarian psyche.)
To: Olog-hai
I read their correction at that time, and it definitely did not specifically state that there was NO LINK BETWEEN PALIN AND THE SHOOTING OF GIFFORDS. It was a half-assed correction, made only AFTER there was talk of a lawsuit. But, given the liberal judges sitting in all most every court, they will probably toss the suit.
13 posted on
07/15/2017 5:41:30 PM PDT by
euram
To: Olog-hai
the suit can only be dismissed if none of the stated facts are in dispute.
Whether or not what the NYT issued constitutes a retraction will determine if the suit is dismissed.
16 posted on
07/15/2017 6:35:48 PM PDT by
dontreadthis
(I finally came up with this tagline)
To: Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
There was only a retraction when everyone called them on it and Sarah mentioned lawyers would be involved.
Ed
20 posted on
07/15/2017 7:44:47 PM PDT by
husky ed
(FOX NEWS ALERT "Generalissimo Francisco Franco is still dead" THIS HAS BEEN A FOX NEWS ALERT)
To: Olog-hai
Why should anyone pardon a pattern of “lie first, apologize later?” It’s an established practice at the Slimes. I say take ‘em for 100 mil, Sarah!!!
Typical liberal response: “We are not responsible for our actions.” “We are CRY BABIES and should be protected from our irresponsibility.”
25 posted on
07/16/2017 4:52:31 AM PDT by
topher
(Traditional values -- especially family values -- which have been proven over time.)
To: Olog-hai
It was not a prompt OR full ‘correction’
It should have been a total retraction AND apology, and firing of the idiot who wrote it.
It’s been known forever that this was a BS story AT THE TIME.
26 posted on
07/17/2017 7:19:34 AM PDT by
Mr. K
(***THERE IS NO CONSEQUENCE OF REPEALING OBAMACARE THAT IS WORSE THAN OBAMACARE ITSELF***)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
