Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Dilbert San Diego

Some municipalities have made it very onerous for Uber to do business - Austin, TX. comes to mind. Uber and Lyft both had decided to not do business there, though I think that has changed in recent weeks. The usual suspects are in play here - the taxi lobby is strong in many cities and the government officials fall in line.

I think enough citizens have to make a racket about demanding ride-sharing services for these cities to yield. For example, enough of us here in San Jose made a stink about letting Uber pick up at the airport for the city council to agree to it.


8 posted on 06/20/2017 12:38:06 PM PDT by NohSpinZone (First thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: NohSpinZone

You want to see a confusing legal situation for Uber? Come here to Newark International Airport in New Jersey. The airport straddles the municipal boundary between the cities of Newark and Elizabeth, which is also the border between two different counties. I believe Uber is permitted to pick up and drop off passengers at Terminals B and C (located in Newark), but their legal status is still up in the air at Terminal A (located in Elizabeth).


12 posted on 06/20/2017 12:42:36 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("I was elected to represent the citizens of Pittsburgh, not Paris." -- President Trump, 6/1/2017)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson