Replies

itsahoot: "And just what part of the current instruction on evolution, would encourage anyone to believe there even was a God?"

None, because it's science and science, by definition, only covers natural causes for natural processes.
As soon as you bring supernatural God into the picture, it's no longer natural science.
That's why you don't want government union employees teaching your children your religious beliefs.
You and your church should do that.

Now, in the proper church-school setting, your pastor can explain Genesis and answer any questions about evolution or science your children may ask.
Then you can be certain your own religious beliefs are being passed on to your family.
But that can never happen in government schools, never, and you absolutely don't want it to.

How is that not plain & clear?

itsahoot: "Look into how 97% of scientists believe man made global warming is true.
Then see if any scientific journal will let anyone contest that statement in their peer reviewed publications, they won't.
The government is involved in this scam 100%."

Well, first, I don't for a minute believe that 97% number.
At least not if applied to the AlGore "inconvenient truth" political agenda nonsense.
Sure, 97% of "scientists" will say that it's warmer today than it was at some time in the past -- for example, in January.
But the full throated Leftist One World Big Government socialist agenda is not approved by 97% of anybody regardless of how often AlGore claims otherwise.

Second, there are peer-reviewed reports, including even some from the government itself, which say AGW is not the great boogeyman Leftist claim.

And third, a point I always make on this: looking at the geological record of past ice-ages, it appears we are today past due for the next one, and when ice ages arrive they arrive very quickly, in a matter of decades.
Now I don't know what might trigger ice-ages, but it still seems to me that a little "global warming" might help delay the next one by even a few centuries.
That would be good!

itsahoot: "Marxists referred to these people as useful Idiots."

Totally agree!

That's why you don't want government union employees teaching your children your religious beliefs.

B$ you want them taught disbelief but it won't matter in any case they will soon enough will be required to learn Shari.

Sure, 97% of "scientists" will say that it's warmer today than it was at some time in the past -- for example, in January. But the full throated Leftist One World Big Government socialist agenda is not approved by 97% of anybody regardless of how often AlGore claims otherwise.

You don't know where it came from, likely because none of your scientific journals have told you, since they are complicit in creating that lie.

You are the one that keeps interjecting God in this discussion, I only mentioned Him in an attempt to show that you do not have to believe in God to believe evolutionist are bigger fibbers than most fisherman.

“None, because it’s science and science, by definition, only covers natural causes for natural processes.”

Yes. Exactly.

But many atheists and liberals don’t seem to understand this and think science disproves religion.

Examples are Richard Dawkins, Bill Nye, etc...

Stephen Gould, an atheist and Marxist, did understand this and said science doesn’t and can’t address God Richard Dawkins was furious at him for saying that. My respect for Gould increased a lot when I learned he had made this point.

This belief that science negates God is part of the politicalization of science and it is harming science. The so-called March for Science is a prime example of the Politicalization of Science.